My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1110
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
1110
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:43 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:20:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
1110
Author
Lamarra, V., M. Lamarra and J. Carter
Title
Ecological Investigation of a Suspected Spawning Site of Colorado Squawfish on the Yampa River, Utah
USFW Year
1985
USFW - Doc Type
Great Basin Naturalist
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br />.• <br /> <br />z~ <br />January 1985 LAMARRA ET AL.: SQUAW FISH 139 <br />isms: avoidance of sand (0.25 cm) and selec- <br />tion for either small substrate (<0 .075 cm) <br />or larger substrate (2.5 to 10 cm). Exam- <br />ination of the interactions between these <br />biotic components and substrate size appears <br />to be consistent with the findings of Cum- <br />mins and Lauff (1969). <br />The distribution of fish across the various <br />substrate sizes differed by species. The en- <br />demic fish appeared to avoid sand and gravel <br />and select from intermediate to large sub- <br />strates. Within the nonnative species, sand <br />shiners appeared to prefer environmental <br />conditions associated with the smallest sub- <br />strate, whereas red and redside shiners fa- <br />vored intermediate (2.5 to 7.5 cm) substrates. <br />All species avoided sand. The mechanisms <br />causing the above observed distributions of <br />endemic and nonnative fishes are unknown; <br />however, the similar distributions o€ the fish, <br />periphyton, and macroinvertebrates with <br />substrate size indicate important interactions. <br />As noted previously, the density of the riv- <br />er biocenosis changed markedly over differ- <br />ent substrate types; however, as Carlson et al. <br />(1979) have stated, the distribution of organ- <br />isms may be more influenced by com- <br />binations of the effect of physical and biotic <br />characteristics than by physical factors alone. <br />Our data indicate these types of inter- <br />relationships are important in the Yampa <br />River. For example, no statistical relationship <br />was found between the biomass of macroin- <br />vertebrates and the biomass of periphyton or <br />detritus; however, a significant relationship <br />was found between water velocity and mac- <br />roinvertebrate biomass (rz = + .45; p = .Ol), <br />This relationship was believed to be indirect <br />because the dominant benthic macroinverte- <br />brate functional group was found to be fine <br />particulate collectors or filter feeders (989b of <br />the total biomass) that may be responding to <br />areas of high food availability (high flow). <br />An attempt has been made in this report to <br />quantitatively describe the physical and bio- <br />logical environment at a suspected spawning <br />site for Colorado squawfish. The Yampa Riv- <br />er at mile 16.5_-was dominated by loose <br />cobble substrate in association with large <br />sandy pools. This site was also found to be <br />free of small interstitial particles and organic <br />material. This area appeared to be heavily <br />used by several species of larval fishes and <br />actively feeding adults. The combination of <br />well-washed coarse substrate (cobble), abun- <br />dant food (both drift and benthos), and adja- <br />cent areas with slow, uniform laminar flow <br />may be critical factors in determining pre- <br />ferred reproductive sites of Colorado <br />squawfish. <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />L. A dominant abiotic factor appeared to <br />be substrate type and associated inter- <br />stitial sediment size fractions. <br />a. Yampa River mile 16.5 was domi- <br />nated by cobble substrate with in- <br />terstitial voids containing little or <br />no organics. <br />b. Associated with these cobble areas <br />were sand-substrate pools. <br />c. Periphyton, macroinvertebrates, <br />and fishes were found in lowest <br />densities in or on sandy substrates. <br />d. Highest densities of periphyton, <br />macroinvertebrates, and fishes <br />were found over substrates smaller <br />than boulders (except sand). <br />e. Roundtail chubs were dominant <br />among the endemic fishes and pre- <br />ferred cobble substrate. <br />f. Nonnatives were dominated by <br />redside shiners and red shiners, <br />and both species were most abun- <br />dant over cobble substrates. <br />g. Sand shiners were the only species <br />to demonstrate a preference for <br />silt substrates. <br />2. Samples showed nocturnal hours to be <br />important periods of biological <br />activity. <br />a. Periods of highest macroinverte- <br />brate drift occurred between 1500 <br />and 0200 hours. <br />b. Drifting larval fish were collected <br />only after 2000 hours, with the <br />peak occurring at 0100-0125 <br />hours. <br />c. Drifting larval fish appear to have <br />originated in a cobble substrate <br />.with substantial interstitial voids. <br />d. Maximum feeding intensity of fish <br />captured occurred between 1950 <br />and 2140 hours. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.