Laserfiche WebLink
~, <br />~~ <br />i~ <br />January 1985 <br />Riffle <br />N <br />C <br />d <br />E <br />a <br />m <br />a <br />.y <br />L <br />m <br />C <br /> <br />YI <br />C <br />N <br />E <br />'v <br />a <br />N <br />L <br />d <br />C <br />b\ <br />137 <br />POOI <br />Size Fractions (mm) <br />Fig. 6. Distributions of interstitial sediments (percentage of total weight) for representative riffle and pool tran- <br />sects in the White River as compared to representative pool riffle transects in the Yampa River. The smallest two <br />size fractions that are causing armoring in the White River sediments are 25%-30% of the total sediments. These <br />fractions in the Yampa River are only 4% of the total. <br />that larval fishes were captured only in the <br />vicinity where squawfish were collected and <br />that their movement corresponded to macro- <br />invertebrate drift (2125-0100 hours). Five <br />species of larval fishes emerged from this <br />cobble site. Furthermore, inspection of the <br />data collected at each seining site indicates a <br />potential movement of fish from this same <br />area at approximately the same time (Fig. 4), <br />suggesting that the habitat was utilized by <br />species other than Colorado squawfish. <br />An important characteristic of this cobble <br />area was the interstitial voids that contained <br />little or no organics. The difference in drift <br />above and below this area strongly suggests <br />that larval fishes utilize these voids. Beames- <br />derfer and Congleton (1982) observed the <br />northern squawfish (Ptychocheilus orego- <br />nensis) spawning in similar cobble and gravel <br />sites in the St. Joe River, Idaho, where there <br />was an absence of small substrates (sand) with <br />adhering eggs up to 15 cm below the sub- <br />LAMARRA ET AL.: SQUAWFISH <br />strate surface. Prewitt et al. (1982) indicated <br />that other similar habitats exist in the White <br />River. However, their analysis of physical <br />habitat and stream flow requirements for <br />spawning squawfish considers only substrate <br />size, not interstitial particles or voids. In the <br />White River, the armored sediments (Fig. 6) <br />prevent interstitial voids from developing, <br />thus making the cobble habitat at Yampa <br />River mile 16.5 unique in comparison to ob- <br />served sites in other tributaries. It should be <br />noted that Haynes and Muth (1982) did col- <br />lect larval squawfish at Yampa River mile <br />17.8 on 14 August 1982. These fish were esti- <br />mated to be 25 days old, indicating another <br />spawning site above river mile 16.5. <br />The physical factors that regulate the dis- <br />tribution of organisms in stream environ- <br />ments are varied. Such factors as nutrients <br />(Hynes 1970), turbidity (Mann et al. 1972), <br />temperature (Sprules 1947), light (Westlake <br />1966), and water velocity (McIntire 1966) <br />w Q.V- <br />Size Fractions (mm) <br />