Laserfiche WebLink
April 1985 MCADA, WYDOSKI: FLANNELMOUTH SUCKER <br />283 <br />TABLE 1. Length-weight, body-scale and length-fecundity relationships for flannelmouth stickers from the <br />Gunnison, Colorado, Green, and Yampa rivers, 1975-1976. <br />LENGTH-WEIGHT <br /> <br />Yampa/Green: Log W = 3.13 Log TL - 5.37 (n = 297, R2 = 0.9) <br />Colorado/Gunnison: Log W = 3.09 Log TL - 5.21 (n = 292, R2 = 0.9) <br />BODY-SCALE <br />Yampa/Green Rivers <br />Male: TL = -18.6342 + 4.8894 SR - 0.0054 SR2 - 0.0004 SR3 (n = 139, R2 = 0.9) <br />Female: TL = -8.7835 + 3.5187 SR + 0.0131 SR2 - 0.0001 SR3 (n = 137, R2 = 0.8) <br />Colorado/ Gunnison Rivers <br />Male: TL = -8.7835 + 2.9904 SR + 0.0156 SR2 - 0.0001 SR3 (n = 158, R2 = 0.8) <br />Female: TL = 46.385 + 0.2820 SR + 0.0443 SR2 - 0.0002 SR3 (n = 137, R2 = 0.8) <br />LENGTH-FECUNDITY <br />Yampa/Green: Log F = 4.03 Log TL - 6.70 (n = 58, R2 = 0.6) <br />Colorado: Log F = 3.00 Log TL - 3.76 (n = 45, R2 = 0.7) <br />Gunnison: Log F = 3.48 Log TL - 5.14 (n = 15, R2 = 0.6) <br />were counted. The fecundity of that fish was <br />then estimated by proportion using total ova- <br />ry weight. Total counts of ova from two fish <br />demonstrated that estimated fecundity dif- <br />fered from actual fecundity by less than 5%. <br />The mean diameter of mature ova from indi- <br />vidual fish was derived from measurements of <br />30 ova made with an ocular micrometer. The <br />total length-fecundity relationships were de- <br />termined using the equation Log F = b, Log <br />TL - bo (Bagenal 1967), where F is fecundity <br />and bo and bI are empirical constants derived <br />using least-squares analysis. <br />Statistical comparisons between length- <br />weight, body-scale, and length-fecundity <br />regression equations were made using analy- <br />sis of covariance (Snedecor and Cochran <br />1967). <br />this report (Fig. 2). Average growth in- <br />crements of all fish were greatest at the for- <br />mation of the third annulus and declined <br />steadily thereafter. <br />Data for the two sexes were combined be- <br />cause there was no significant difference be- <br />tween the length-weight relationships for <br />male and female flannelmouth suckers <br />(P>0.05). No statistical difference was de- <br />tected between length-weight regressions <br />from data on fish from the Gunnison and Col- <br />orado rivers (P>0.05). Flannelmouth suckers <br />from the Colorado and Gunnison rivers were <br />significantly heavier than fish of equal length <br />from the Yampa and Green rivers (P<0.001: <br />Table 1). <br />Reproduction <br />RESULTS <br />Age and Growth <br />About 80% of the flannelmouth suckers <br />used in our analyses were collected between <br />April and July. The collection from the Gun- <br />nison River was made in April 1976. Body- <br />scale relationships differed significantly be- <br />tween male and female fish among the study <br />areas (P<0.05: Table 1). However, mean <br />length at annulus formation was similar for <br />the study groups and they were averaged for <br />In the Colorado and Gunnison River col- <br />lections, the smallest mature female was 421 <br />mm long, and all females longer than 490 <br />mm were mature. The smallest mature male <br />was 391 mm long, and all males 470 mm or <br />longer from the Colorado and Gunnison riv- <br />ers were mature. In the Yampa and Green <br />River collections, the smallest mature male <br />was 393 mm long, and all males were mature <br />at 460 mm: the smallest mature female was <br />405 mm long and all females were mature at <br />470 mm (Table 2). Thus, fish began to mature <br />at age IV and most were mature by age VI.