Laserfiche WebLink
different spatial configuration of electrodes <br />on the trawl and different parameters of <br />electric current. It was established that <br />with the stimulating action of the electric <br />current on fish at frequencies of 20-25 Hz <br />in contrast to 60-100 Hz, the most distinct <br />manifestation of defensive behavioral reac- <br />tions occurred in pelagic fishes. In our <br />opinion, the results of this original stage <br />of research were of great interest because <br />they helped in the further understanding of <br />the processes of catch formation in electro- <br />trawl fishing. <br />In this work some features of the defen- <br />sive reaction of pelagic fishes on entering <br />the electric field of a trawl with current <br />parameters f = 20-25 Hz; Ja = 4-6 kA; <br />T = 1.6 msee are discussed. <br />Research Methods <br />Methods of underwater visual observa- <br />nt near a 24.7-meter bottom trawl have <br />been previously described in detail (Maksi- <br />mov, 1976). We shall show merely some <br />differences in observation procedures ap- <br />plicable to the study of the reactions and <br />behavior of fish in the electric fields of a <br />trawL* <br />During observations on the behavior of <br />fish the maximum trawling speed was 3. 8 <br />knots. Visual observations with the re- <br />cording registration of the most }}interesting <br />moments on camera and film wete the main <br />methods of studying the behavior and reac- <br />tions of fish in the trawl. At the same time <br />the entry of schools of fish into the trawl, <br />their encounter with the electric field, the <br />reactions of fish when the current is switched <br />on, their narcotization and entrapment in <br />the trawl-by the electric field were record- <br />ed. The assessment of the effect of various <br />current parameters on the fish were car- <br />ried out on the basis of the amplitude of the <br />vibration of the body of the fish in response <br />to the current pulses, on the basis of the <br />time of reorientation of the fish in the elec- <br />tric field and the nature of their reaction <br />to the action of the current, on the basis of <br />the time of the onset of electro-narcosis <br />(shock) and of the time of the freeing of fish <br />from the entire space between the electrodes, <br />or of its individual zones. <br />*The author wishes to thank G. V. Fey- <br />gel'man, N. 1. Dogadov, B. V. Shurygin, <br />0. L Kovtanyuk and N. V. Safonov who gave <br />us-great assistance in carrying out under- <br />water research. <br />For a detailed examination of the reactions <br />of fish in the point of the trawl concerned, <br />and also in order to concentrate the atten- <br />tion of researchers on the individual aspects <br />of fish behavior, the space between the elec- <br />trodes of the trawl was conditionally divided <br />into zones (Figs. I and 2). Size of zone: <br />zone A 2-4 m; zone B 2-3 m; zone C 1. 5-2 <br />m; zone D 1. 0-2 m. The distance between <br />the electrodes was 4-5 m. The observations <br />were carried out with two variants of trawl <br />electrification: The "vertical electric field" <br />where the electrodes were on the upper and <br />lower panels of the trawls (Fig. 1) and the <br />"horizontal electric field" where the ring <br />electrodes were placed along the horizontal <br />axis of the trawl (Fig. 2). The "vertical" <br />and "horizontal" electric fields have been <br />named by us conditionally, because in this <br />case the vertical (horizontal) predominates <br />in the space between the electrodes, consti- <br />tuting the vector for the intensity of the <br />electric field. <br />The electrodes were prepared from 2mm2 <br />guage copper wire, mark PShch, in the form <br />of webbing with mesh size a = 180 mm, situ- <br />ated in the region of parts I-II of the belly of <br />the trawl. Dimensions of electrodes: for <br />the "vertical electric field", 6 rhombic <br />cathodes covered the upper panel of the trawl <br />along the entire perimeter, the two middle <br />cathodes were 3 x 3 m and the four marginal <br />ones (two on each side) were 2.2 x 2. 2 m, <br />and an anode 1 x 8 m was situated on the <br />lower panel of the trawl; for the "horizontal <br />electric field" the ring electrodes were I <br />m wide, and the distance between them 2.5- <br />2.8 m. The source of the pulse current was <br />the ship's pulse generator, which made it <br />possible to supply the electrodes of the trawl <br />with unipolar pulses of varying frequency, <br />amplitude and duration. The operator was <br />able to change these parameters within a <br />wide range on the order of the divers. <br />Pelagic fishes were the main subjects of <br />observation: the round scad, Decapterus <br />punctatus, 15-16 cm in size, the sardinella, <br />Sardinella anchovia, 16-17 cm in size and a <br />mackerel, Pneumatophorus coltas, 18-25 cm. <br />Research Results <br />Peculiarities of the defensive behavior <br />and reactions of fish in the "vertical electric <br />field". Underwater observations and sub- <br />sequent analysis of the reactions and move- <br />ments of pelagic fishes (Carangidae and Sar- <br />dinella) when the current was switched on <br />made it possible to divide the trawl into <br />several zones in which the behavior of the <br />fish differed to some extent (Fig. 1). <br />i ? <br />po <br />O <br />O <br />B <br />E ?? i ?XSE <br />777-77- <br />Fig. 1. Diagram of movement <br />of Sardinella and Carangidae in <br />different zones of the space be- <br />tween electrodes in a 24. 7-meter <br />bottom trawl with current param- <br />eters f = 20-25 Hz; Ja = 4-6 kA. <br />"Vertical electric field"; a) <br />longitudinal section of trawl; b) <br />cross section of trawl. The <br />broken line denotes the fish <br />which have escaped from the <br />trawl; the solid line the fish re- <br />maining in the trawl, and a cir- <br />cle denotes narcotized fish. <br />A, B, C, D, E are the zones of <br />the trawl. <br />The electric current parameters em- <br />ployed ensured the narcosis (shock) and the <br />carrying of the fish 0. 8-1 m from the posi- <br />tive electrode. In the rest of the space <br />between the electrodes the fish experienced <br />only the stimulating action of the current <br />and responded to this by defensive be- <br />havioral reactions which were particularly <br />clearly manifested in zone A (Fig. 1, a). <br />This zone, the widest of all the zones in <br />the space between the electrodes, occupied <br />around 30% of the entire volume of the <br />trawl, affected by the action of the electric <br />current. Here there were all the factors <br />assisting the manifestation of various de- <br />fensive behavioral reactions: the stimulat- <br />ing action of the current, the absence of <br />obstacles in the mouth of the trawl, the be- <br />havior of the fish moving forwards, etc. <br />When the current was switched on, the <br />fish moving in zone A made a smooth turn <br />forward, upward or downward, increasing <br />their motor activity sharply. The distance <br />between the fish decreased and theycrowded <br />together and within 10-15 seconds moved <br />out of the zone providing the stimulus. <br />Some of the escaping fish endeavoured to <br />shift in the direction of the lift into the so- <br />called "shadow zones of E" where the tension <br />of the electric field is somewhat lower than <br />throughout the space between the electrodes <br />(Fig. 1, b). Up to 50% of the fish moving in <br />zones A and B collected in the "shadow zones" <br />with current parameters f 20 Hz; Ja = 4-6 <br />kA. This defensive behavioral reaction, <br />conditionally tailed by us "escape reaction", <br />was observed with various trawl electrifica- <br />tion systems and was particularly clearly <br />manifested when the positive electrode was on <br />the lower panel of the trawl. In this case <br />the action of the electric current causing <br />anode electrotaxis was superimposed on the <br />biological fright reaction which is expressed <br />under natural conditions by the withdrawal of <br />fish into the depths (Radakov, 1970) and which <br />was frequently observed by us in the ordinary <br />bottom trawl. <br />The change in polarity (positive electrode <br />on the upper panel of the trawl) provoked <br />only anode electrotaxis in the fish which <br />had followed the positive electrode at a dis- <br />tance of approximately 0.5 m. These fish <br />performed a rapid movement forward and <br />upward and for the most part escaped through <br />the net and the electrode from the trawl. <br />It is interesting to note that single fish which <br />had escaped in this manner then again entered <br />the trawl under the influence of the positive <br />electrode. The distance from the positive <br />electrode on the outer side of the trawl, in <br />which anode electrotaxis was observed in <br />fish, or the "external zone of effective elec- <br />trotaxis", depended on the current param- <br />eters applied and the electrification system <br />of the trawl. In the case in question it did <br />not exceed 0.5-1 m. On the other hand, <br />groups of fish (20-30 fish and more) con- <br />tinued for 1-2 minutes to follow in the "outer <br />zone of effective electrotaxis". Feeling the <br />effect of the current, they gradually drifted <br />backwards or, coming into contact with the <br />electrodes, were instantly narcotized. Such <br />a movement of the fish from the outer side <br />of the trawl into the field of action of the <br />electric current can evidently be explained <br />by the fact that in these fish a stable optomo- <br />tor reaction had begun, during which the re- <br />sistance of the fish to the action of the <br />electric current had increased (Fig. 3). <br />Dense schools or individual fish, which in <br />relation to others had a greater turn of <br />speed, were most often successful in escap- <br />ing through the "outer zone of effective <br />electrotaxis". The optomotor reaction of <br />fish in the trawl when the current was <br />switched on, which was manifested in com- <br />bination with other reactions, was evidently <br />one of the main reasons preventing the <br />306 1 307