different spatial configuration of electrodes
<br />on the trawl and different parameters of
<br />electric current. It was established that
<br />with the stimulating action of the electric
<br />current on fish at frequencies of 20-25 Hz
<br />in contrast to 60-100 Hz, the most distinct
<br />manifestation of defensive behavioral reac-
<br />tions occurred in pelagic fishes. In our
<br />opinion, the results of this original stage
<br />of research were of great interest because
<br />they helped in the further understanding of
<br />the processes of catch formation in electro-
<br />trawl fishing.
<br />In this work some features of the defen-
<br />sive reaction of pelagic fishes on entering
<br />the electric field of a trawl with current
<br />parameters f = 20-25 Hz; Ja = 4-6 kA;
<br />T = 1.6 msee are discussed.
<br />Research Methods
<br />Methods of underwater visual observa-
<br />nt near a 24.7-meter bottom trawl have
<br />been previously described in detail (Maksi-
<br />mov, 1976). We shall show merely some
<br />differences in observation procedures ap-
<br />plicable to the study of the reactions and
<br />behavior of fish in the electric fields of a
<br />trawL*
<br />During observations on the behavior of
<br />fish the maximum trawling speed was 3. 8
<br />knots. Visual observations with the re-
<br />cording registration of the most }}interesting
<br />moments on camera and film wete the main
<br />methods of studying the behavior and reac-
<br />tions of fish in the trawl. At the same time
<br />the entry of schools of fish into the trawl,
<br />their encounter with the electric field, the
<br />reactions of fish when the current is switched
<br />on, their narcotization and entrapment in
<br />the trawl-by the electric field were record-
<br />ed. The assessment of the effect of various
<br />current parameters on the fish were car-
<br />ried out on the basis of the amplitude of the
<br />vibration of the body of the fish in response
<br />to the current pulses, on the basis of the
<br />time of reorientation of the fish in the elec-
<br />tric field and the nature of their reaction
<br />to the action of the current, on the basis of
<br />the time of the onset of electro-narcosis
<br />(shock) and of the time of the freeing of fish
<br />from the entire space between the electrodes,
<br />or of its individual zones.
<br />*The author wishes to thank G. V. Fey-
<br />gel'man, N. 1. Dogadov, B. V. Shurygin,
<br />0. L Kovtanyuk and N. V. Safonov who gave
<br />us-great assistance in carrying out under-
<br />water research.
<br />For a detailed examination of the reactions
<br />of fish in the point of the trawl concerned,
<br />and also in order to concentrate the atten-
<br />tion of researchers on the individual aspects
<br />of fish behavior, the space between the elec-
<br />trodes of the trawl was conditionally divided
<br />into zones (Figs. I and 2). Size of zone:
<br />zone A 2-4 m; zone B 2-3 m; zone C 1. 5-2
<br />m; zone D 1. 0-2 m. The distance between
<br />the electrodes was 4-5 m. The observations
<br />were carried out with two variants of trawl
<br />electrification: The "vertical electric field"
<br />where the electrodes were on the upper and
<br />lower panels of the trawls (Fig. 1) and the
<br />"horizontal electric field" where the ring
<br />electrodes were placed along the horizontal
<br />axis of the trawl (Fig. 2). The "vertical"
<br />and "horizontal" electric fields have been
<br />named by us conditionally, because in this
<br />case the vertical (horizontal) predominates
<br />in the space between the electrodes, consti-
<br />tuting the vector for the intensity of the
<br />electric field.
<br />The electrodes were prepared from 2mm2
<br />guage copper wire, mark PShch, in the form
<br />of webbing with mesh size a = 180 mm, situ-
<br />ated in the region of parts I-II of the belly of
<br />the trawl. Dimensions of electrodes: for
<br />the "vertical electric field", 6 rhombic
<br />cathodes covered the upper panel of the trawl
<br />along the entire perimeter, the two middle
<br />cathodes were 3 x 3 m and the four marginal
<br />ones (two on each side) were 2.2 x 2. 2 m,
<br />and an anode 1 x 8 m was situated on the
<br />lower panel of the trawl; for the "horizontal
<br />electric field" the ring electrodes were I
<br />m wide, and the distance between them 2.5-
<br />2.8 m. The source of the pulse current was
<br />the ship's pulse generator, which made it
<br />possible to supply the electrodes of the trawl
<br />with unipolar pulses of varying frequency,
<br />amplitude and duration. The operator was
<br />able to change these parameters within a
<br />wide range on the order of the divers.
<br />Pelagic fishes were the main subjects of
<br />observation: the round scad, Decapterus
<br />punctatus, 15-16 cm in size, the sardinella,
<br />Sardinella anchovia, 16-17 cm in size and a
<br />mackerel, Pneumatophorus coltas, 18-25 cm.
<br />Research Results
<br />Peculiarities of the defensive behavior
<br />and reactions of fish in the "vertical electric
<br />field". Underwater observations and sub-
<br />sequent analysis of the reactions and move-
<br />ments of pelagic fishes (Carangidae and Sar-
<br />dinella) when the current was switched on
<br />made it possible to divide the trawl into
<br />several zones in which the behavior of the
<br />fish differed to some extent (Fig. 1).
<br />i ?
<br />po
<br />O
<br />O
<br />B
<br />E ?? i ?XSE
<br />777-77-
<br />Fig. 1. Diagram of movement
<br />of Sardinella and Carangidae in
<br />different zones of the space be-
<br />tween electrodes in a 24. 7-meter
<br />bottom trawl with current param-
<br />eters f = 20-25 Hz; Ja = 4-6 kA.
<br />"Vertical electric field"; a)
<br />longitudinal section of trawl; b)
<br />cross section of trawl. The
<br />broken line denotes the fish
<br />which have escaped from the
<br />trawl; the solid line the fish re-
<br />maining in the trawl, and a cir-
<br />cle denotes narcotized fish.
<br />A, B, C, D, E are the zones of
<br />the trawl.
<br />The electric current parameters em-
<br />ployed ensured the narcosis (shock) and the
<br />carrying of the fish 0. 8-1 m from the posi-
<br />tive electrode. In the rest of the space
<br />between the electrodes the fish experienced
<br />only the stimulating action of the current
<br />and responded to this by defensive be-
<br />havioral reactions which were particularly
<br />clearly manifested in zone A (Fig. 1, a).
<br />This zone, the widest of all the zones in
<br />the space between the electrodes, occupied
<br />around 30% of the entire volume of the
<br />trawl, affected by the action of the electric
<br />current. Here there were all the factors
<br />assisting the manifestation of various de-
<br />fensive behavioral reactions: the stimulat-
<br />ing action of the current, the absence of
<br />obstacles in the mouth of the trawl, the be-
<br />havior of the fish moving forwards, etc.
<br />When the current was switched on, the
<br />fish moving in zone A made a smooth turn
<br />forward, upward or downward, increasing
<br />their motor activity sharply. The distance
<br />between the fish decreased and theycrowded
<br />together and within 10-15 seconds moved
<br />out of the zone providing the stimulus.
<br />Some of the escaping fish endeavoured to
<br />shift in the direction of the lift into the so-
<br />called "shadow zones of E" where the tension
<br />of the electric field is somewhat lower than
<br />throughout the space between the electrodes
<br />(Fig. 1, b). Up to 50% of the fish moving in
<br />zones A and B collected in the "shadow zones"
<br />with current parameters f 20 Hz; Ja = 4-6
<br />kA. This defensive behavioral reaction,
<br />conditionally tailed by us "escape reaction",
<br />was observed with various trawl electrifica-
<br />tion systems and was particularly clearly
<br />manifested when the positive electrode was on
<br />the lower panel of the trawl. In this case
<br />the action of the electric current causing
<br />anode electrotaxis was superimposed on the
<br />biological fright reaction which is expressed
<br />under natural conditions by the withdrawal of
<br />fish into the depths (Radakov, 1970) and which
<br />was frequently observed by us in the ordinary
<br />bottom trawl.
<br />The change in polarity (positive electrode
<br />on the upper panel of the trawl) provoked
<br />only anode electrotaxis in the fish which
<br />had followed the positive electrode at a dis-
<br />tance of approximately 0.5 m. These fish
<br />performed a rapid movement forward and
<br />upward and for the most part escaped through
<br />the net and the electrode from the trawl.
<br />It is interesting to note that single fish which
<br />had escaped in this manner then again entered
<br />the trawl under the influence of the positive
<br />electrode. The distance from the positive
<br />electrode on the outer side of the trawl, in
<br />which anode electrotaxis was observed in
<br />fish, or the "external zone of effective elec-
<br />trotaxis", depended on the current param-
<br />eters applied and the electrification system
<br />of the trawl. In the case in question it did
<br />not exceed 0.5-1 m. On the other hand,
<br />groups of fish (20-30 fish and more) con-
<br />tinued for 1-2 minutes to follow in the "outer
<br />zone of effective electrotaxis". Feeling the
<br />effect of the current, they gradually drifted
<br />backwards or, coming into contact with the
<br />electrodes, were instantly narcotized. Such
<br />a movement of the fish from the outer side
<br />of the trawl into the field of action of the
<br />electric current can evidently be explained
<br />by the fact that in these fish a stable optomo-
<br />tor reaction had begun, during which the re-
<br />sistance of the fish to the action of the
<br />electric current had increased (Fig. 3).
<br />Dense schools or individual fish, which in
<br />relation to others had a greater turn of
<br />speed, were most often successful in escap-
<br />ing through the "outer zone of effective
<br />electrotaxis". The optomotor reaction of
<br />fish in the trawl when the current was
<br />switched on, which was manifested in com-
<br />bination with other reactions, was evidently
<br />one of the main reasons preventing the
<br />306 1 307
|