My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7819
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7819
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:19:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7819
Author
Many
Title
Journal of Applied Aquaculture
USFW Year
1992
USFW - Doc Type
1(3)
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
16 JOURNAL OF APPLIED AQUACUI,TURE <br />Model Verification <br />The ability of Equation 12 to predict the maximum carrying ca- <br />pacity of biofilters was verified by comparing the predicted and <br />empirically determined carrying capacities of the gravel, gravel + <br />oxygenation, gravel +ozonation, granular carbon + oxygenation <br />(fluidized bed), and granular carbon +ozonation (fluidized bed) <br />biofilters. The value of C used in these comparisons was 2.0 mg/I. <br />The value of R for each biofilter was calculated from ammonia <br />measurements made when the fish loads were 50% or less of the <br />maximum carrying capacity, <br />Empirically determined carrying capacities for the five biofilters <br />ranged from 7.5 to 69.4 kg; predicted carrying capacities ranged <br />from 5.6 to 81.0 kg. The correlation (r = 0.997, RZ = 0.994, <br />P<0.05) between the empirically determined and predicted carry- <br />ing capacities is near unity, which indicates that the model accu- <br />rately estimated the carrying capacities of the systems (Figure 3). <br />However, with the exception of the fluidized granular carbon + <br />ozonation biofilter, the predicted carrying capacities fell slightly <br />short (by 1.8 to 4.7 kg) of the empirically determined carrying ca- <br />pacities, possibly reflecting the removal of ammonia from the fish <br />culture system by bacteria located outside the biofilter (i.e., free <br />floating in the water, attached to suspended solids, on the insides of <br />pipes, in sedimentation tanks, etc.). <br />This type of error will not be significant if most of the ammonia <br />removal occurs in the biofilter, but it may be important if ammonia <br />removal outside the biofilter is a substantial proportion of the total <br />ammonia removal. Unlike the other biofilters, the carrying capacity <br />of the fluidized granular carbon +ozonation biofilter was over- <br />estimated (by 11.6 kg). This may have resulted from the accumula- <br />tion of organic matter at high fish loads with attendant reductions in <br />nitrification (see Bovendeur et al. 1990) which prevented the theo- <br />retical maximum nitrification rate at 2.0 mg/t ammonia-nitrogen <br />from being realized. <br />Equation 12 can be used to predict biofilter carrying capacity at <br />different flow rates. This capability was verified by comparing the <br />predicted ammonia removal rates and the empirically determined <br />ammonia removal rates of two experimental biofiltration systems. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.