My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7819
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7819
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:19:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7819
Author
Many
Title
Journal of Applied Aquaculture
USFW Year
1992
USFW - Doc Type
1(3)
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
10 JOURNAL OF APPL/ED AQUACULTURE <br />Note that R is constant over the entire range of half-order ammonia <br />removal, only if C and the quantity C-E (i.e., ammonia drop in Fig- <br />ure 2) are linearly related with a y-intercept of zero. The y-intercept <br />for this relationship was not significantly different (P<0.05) from <br />zero in the gravel +ozonation, granular carbon +ozonation, and <br />fluidized granular carbon +ozonation biofilters, but it was signifi- <br />cantly different from zero in the fluidized granular carbon + oxy- <br />genation biofilter. The occurrence of a significant positive intercept <br />for ammonia removal in this biofilter may reflect a decrease in nitri- <br />ficationefficiency as ammonia concentrations increased. Such a de- <br />crease could occur as a result of the accumulation of organic matter <br />in the biofiltration system. The accumulation of organic matter is <br />dependent upon the efficiency of organic matter removal from the <br />system which, in turn, is partly dependent on system management <br />and on other components of the recycle system (such as physical <br />filters) intended specifically to remove organic matter. <br />Ammonia removal (R) is a function of the retention time (i.e., <br />time required to fill the biofilter [containing filter medium] with <br />water}. Consider the effect of multiple passes through a biofilter <br />with a hypothetical removal of 0.40 and retention time of one min- <br />ute. If the initial influent ammonia concentration is 2.0 mg amm~- <br />nia-nitrogen/l, the concentration following one pass through the <br />biofilter will be 1.2 mg ammonia-nitrogen/l. The concentration fol- <br />lowing asecond pass through the biofilter (assuming no further ad- <br />dition of ammonia} will be 0.72 mg ammonia-nitrogen/1 or approxi- <br />mately 0.35 of the initial concentration. This number (i.e., 0.36) is <br />equal ta: <br />(1 - 0.4)zii <br />with the exponent being the ratio of the cumulative retention time <br />(two minutes} and the original retention time (one minute}. Thus, <br />the effects of a change in retention time on ammonia concentration <br />reduction in a biofilter can be described as follows: <br /> <br />where M =the new retention time in the biofilter and Mr =the <br />original retention time (i.e., the retention time at which R was cal- <br />culated). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.