My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7819
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7819
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:19:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7819
Author
Many
Title
Journal of Applied Aquaculture
USFW Year
1992
USFW - Doc Type
1(3)
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Pa!!er <br />flow rate through the biofilter. This measurement was converted to <br />the ammonia removal rate pier unit of biofilter bed volume (m~). <br />Measurements of the proportion of empty space within the media <br />(i.e., voids fraction) and volumes of the biofilters were used to <br />estimate the amount of water held by each biofilter. The latter quan- <br />tity was divided by the water flow rate through the biofilter to esti- <br />mate the retention time in each biofilter. <br />RESULTIS AND DISCUSSION <br />Etifects of Ammonia Concentration <br />on Ammonia Removal <br />Ammonia removal kinetics were investigated in four biofiltration <br />systems: fluidized granular carbon +ozonation, fluidized granular <br />carbon + oxygenation, granular carbon +ozonation, and gravel + <br />ozonation. Data from the gravel and gravel + oxygenation biofiltra- <br />tion systems did not encompass a wide enough range of ammonia <br />concentrations to permit similar investigations. Ammonia removal <br />was strongly dependent upon the ammonia concentration when the <br />ammonia concentration vvas below 2.0 mg/l, as indicated by coeffi- <br />cients of determination I;RZ) that ranged from 0.62 to 0.88 for the <br />four biofilters (Figure 2). At higher ammonia concentrations, am- <br />monia removal varied sc-mewhat but was independent of the ammo- <br />nia concentration. Thu;, ammonia removal in these biofiltration <br />systems conformed to tlhe half-order/zero-order kinetics model that <br />was developed by Haremoes (1978) and that was verified for aqua- <br />culture by Bovendeur et al. (1987). Fluctuations in ammonia re- <br />moval at high (> 2.0 nng/i) ammonia concentrations may have re- <br />sulted from decreases in nitrification due to the accumulation of <br />organic matter in the biiofiltration systems when fish loads and feed- <br />ing rates wcre temporarily increased to high levels. Organic loading <br />can stimulate the proliferation of heterotrophic bacteria that com- <br />petewith nitrifying bacteria for space and dissolved oxygen (Siddall <br />1974; Parker and Richards 1986). Oxygen concentrations in the ef- <br />fluents of the biofiltration systems remained above 7.0 mg/l <br />throughout these studies. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.