My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7819
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7819
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:19:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7819
Author
Many
Title
Journal of Applied Aquaculture
USFW Year
1992
USFW - Doc Type
1(3)
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
JOURNAL OF APPLIEDAQUACULTURE <br />Each experimental biofilter was part of a biofiltration system that <br />included a rectangular sedimentation tank (35.5 1), a mechanical <br />filter composed of polyester batting, and an 800-! fish tank (Figure <br />1). The biofiltration systems included either a gas/water mixing <br />column to dissolve a mixture of oxygen and ozone ~n the fish tank <br />effluent prior to physical filtration or an oxygenation port at the <br />base of the biofilter to oxygenate the water prior to biofiltration. <br />Ozone was generated from bottled oxygen by means of an ORECy <br />03W9-O azonator. All systems were 100% recycle, except for water <br />added to replace that lost to evaporation and leakage. Water temper- <br />ature was maintained at 20°C in all biofiltration systems. <br />Six types of biofiltration systems were investigated in this study. <br />Each biofiltration system employed a different type of biofilter me- <br />dia and either pre-oxygenation or pre-ozonation of the water prior to <br />biofiltration. The only exception was the gravel biofiltration sys- <br />tem, which employed neither pre-oxygenatton nor pre-ozonation. <br />The other types of biofiltration systems were gravel + oxygena- <br />tion, gravel +ozonation, granular carbon + oxygenation (fluid- <br />ized bed), granular carbon +ozonation (fluidized bed), and granu- <br />lar carbon +ozonation (not fluidized). <br />Initially, each biofiltration system was operated for a minimum <br />of eight weeks after asix- to eight-week acclimation period. Fish <br />iaads and feeding rates were varied during this period to assess the <br />effects of different levels of waste production vn biofilter perfor- <br />mance. Twa of the biofiltration systems were operated with several <br />different flow rates to assess the influence of hydraulic loading rate <br />(i.e., water flow rate per unit of biofilter cross-sectional area) on <br />biofilter performance. The gravel + oxygenation biofilter was op- <br />erated at hydraulic loading rates of 5, 11, 22, and 44 ml/em2/sec- <br />ond, and the granular carbon +ozonation biofilter was operated at <br />hydraulic loading rates of 11 and 44 ml/cmZ/second. The biofilters <br />were operated for a minimum of 17 days at each hydraulic loading <br />rate. <br />In later studies, the carrying capacities of five systems were as- <br />certained: gravel; gravel + oxygenation; grave! +ozonation; gran- <br />ular carbon + oxygenation (fluidized bed); and granular carbon + <br />1. Use of trade names does not imply endorsement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.