Laserfiche WebLink
at this, time, is the judge and jury for resolving the requests for minimum flow require- <br />ments. Although the resource agencies may recommend a minimum flow value, the <br />FERC has the authority not to impose these minimum flow requirements. However, the <br />trend influenced by Congressional representatives and the Courts is to acknowledge <br />the resource agency request. <br />It is the opinion of this writer that the United States is in a long transitional period <br />in its awakening to environmental concerns. The desire to maintain the integrity of <br />our environment has resulted in our ignoring the full effect that such decisions have <br />on thE? costs to our economy. The environmental community is facing difficult choices <br />in promoting restrictions for the development of hydroelectric projects. As more re- <br />strictive regulations are imposed, such as minimum flow releases, new and existing <br />projects may cease to operate. Energy production to meet the public's demand for <br />electricity will be generated by more environmentally damaging sources, such as coal- <br />fired stations. The acid rain effect on the same rivers where hydropower generation is <br />being discouraged is surely of greater concern than the minimum flow requirements <br />to enhance fishery population. If the environmental community is unchallenged in <br />achieving its ideals, what will be the result? Certainly a society without hydroelectric <br />generation is unacceptable. <br />The Electric Consumers Protection Act requires a balance between environmental <br />protection and cost of electricity to consumers. Balance requires cooperation and har- <br />monious communication in an effort to achieve commonly accepted resolution. The <br />preservationist attitude does not seem to recognize the benefits that hydropower pro- <br />vides as an environmentally benign resource. <br />W. B. Smith 5 IN