Laserfiche WebLink
Interaction between biological research <br />5.2 Pollution Control Measures <br />5.2.1 Farmyard Inspections <br />As there was little or no industry in <br />the catchment, the suspicion was that <br />agricultural effluent was the main <br />cause of enrichment of the lake. Two <br />fisheries staff were deployed, on a <br />full-time basis, on continuous inspec- <br />tions of farmyards right throughout the <br />catchemnt, an area of approximately <br />250 square miles. Report sheets were <br />completed in respect of more than <br />500 farms and all problem cases were <br />logged for further investigation by <br />the Board's Fisheries Environmental <br />Officer, an Environmental Science <br />graduate. <br />A total of 140 warning letters were <br />issued, two farmers were prosecuted <br />and 230 farms are now being in- <br />spected regularly. This work has re- <br />sulted in a major improvement in <br />management of farm effluent in the <br />catchment. <br />5.2.3 Monitoring of Planning Appli- <br />cations <br />5 <br />The Board's Fisheries Environmental <br />Officer monitors all planning applic- <br />tions in respect of proposed house <br />construction or other developments <br />around the lake shore. The siting of <br />septic tanks around certain parts of <br />the shoreline is a particular concern <br />due to inability of soils to absorb ef- <br />fluent (Thorne 1988). <br />5.2.4 Phosphate Loading Study <br />A phosphate loading study was in- <br />itiated in conjunction with the Regional <br />Water Laboratory and the Local <br />Authority. All major feeder streams to <br />the lake are sampled on a weekly <br />basis for phosphate and flow read- <br />ings. Any significant rise in phosphate <br />readings is communicated to the <br />Board's inspection staff who immedi- <br />ately concentrate their work in the <br />area indicated. <br />5.2.5 Monitoring of Peat Silt Pollu- <br />tion <br />5.2.2 Sewage Inspections <br />Particular attention was also paid to <br />possible sewage discharges from <br />various points including private <br />houses, hotels, a school and an out- <br />dated local authority sewage plant. <br />One hotel was prosecuted and, as a <br />result of pressure from the Board, two <br />hotels and a large school installed <br />modern sewage treatment systems. <br />The Board is at present prosecuting <br />the Local Authority in relation to dis- <br />charges at the municipal sewage plant <br />which discharges to the River Deel, <br />the main tributary of Lough Conn. <br />A state company is engaged in <br />harvesting milled peat, used for elec- <br />tricity generation, in part of the catch- <br />ment. Substantial quantities of this <br />can be washed into rivers and <br />streams. As well as having a highly <br />adverse effect on spawning beds <br />(Gargan and Caffrey 1990), there is <br />some evidence that such peat <br />deposits can result in release of <br />phosphates under certain conditions. <br />Research on this by the Environmen- <br />tal Research Unit of the Department <br />of the Environment has not yet been <br />completed. Close monitoring of the