Laserfiche WebLink
18 <br />M.-F. O'Grady and J. Curtin <br />nels after works. In more recent years <br />O.P.W. have also reseeded dredged <br />banks with grasses and replanted trees <br />in addition to fencing. When drainage <br />schemes were completed maintenance <br />of fences became the responsability of <br />individual land owners some of whom <br />maintained these structures while <br />others did not. A review of the riparian <br />zones by the authors along rivers <br />drained in the 1950's and 1960's indi- <br />cates that where fences were main- <br />tained post-works a healthy ecological <br />riparian zone with a continuous treeline <br />and associated marginal flora has re- <br />established itself without any replanting <br />programme even where both banks <br />had been stripped of all vegetation at <br />works stage. The nature of these tree- <br />lines varies - in some cases a virtual <br />monoculture of Alder or Willow species <br />has regenerated, while in other circum- <br />stances mixed stands of species evi- <br />dent in the surrounding landscape are <br />present. On properties where riverside <br />fences have not been maintained post- <br />drainage and lands have been used for <br />grazing a healthy riparian zone has not <br />regenerated post-drainage often result- <br />ing in bankside erosion and bank slip- <br />page where livestock have ready <br />access. These observations clearly <br />illustrate that the fencing of channels <br />should be an integral part of drainage <br />operations at works stage. The value <br />of maintaining an undisturbed riparian <br />zone, in both fisheries and general <br />wildlife terms, even in undrained <br />channels has been highlighted by <br />many authors (Waters, 1968, Hynes, <br />1970, Karr and Schlosser, 1978 and <br />others). <br />4d. Retention of Excavated Bed <br />Materials <br />Significant quantities of stone materi- <br />als may be required to carry out the <br />post-drainage fisheries rehabilitation <br />programme. It is suggested that the <br />material from bedrock areas and <br />spawning gravels excavated in the <br />course of drainage works be retained <br />for this purpose where possible to re- <br />duce costs. <br />5. POST-DRAINAGE FISHERIES <br />REHABILITATION PROGRAMMES <br />5a. A Strategy <br />Apart from the bank fencing, reseed- <br />ing and planting programme it is rec- <br />ommended that physical in-stream <br />fishery rehabilitation works be delayed <br />for two years post-drainage for the fol- <br />lowing reasons. While backwater <br />analysis allows one to predict the <br />likely effects of the drainage pro- <br />gramme, the recovery of the channel <br />is dependant on a number of ecologi- <br />cal, physical and hydrological factors <br />which may interact in unforseen ways <br />post-works. <br />Modifications to drainage design <br />may be required at works stage to ac- <br />commodate other public or private in- <br />terests e.g. abstractions or local <br />amenity parks. Consequently the <br />exact nature of the works schedule <br />and its effects on the channel in physi- <br />cal terms cannot always be antici- <br />pated.