My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7773
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7773
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:18:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7773
Author
Many
Title
Hydroecologie Appliquee
USFW Year
1993
USFW - Doc Type
2(5)
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
18 <br />M.-F. O'Grady and J. Curtin <br />nels after works. In more recent years <br />O.P.W. have also reseeded dredged <br />banks with grasses and replanted trees <br />in addition to fencing. When drainage <br />schemes were completed maintenance <br />of fences became the responsability of <br />individual land owners some of whom <br />maintained these structures while <br />others did not. A review of the riparian <br />zones by the authors along rivers <br />drained in the 1950's and 1960's indi- <br />cates that where fences were main- <br />tained post-works a healthy ecological <br />riparian zone with a continuous treeline <br />and associated marginal flora has re- <br />established itself without any replanting <br />programme even where both banks <br />had been stripped of all vegetation at <br />works stage. The nature of these tree- <br />lines varies - in some cases a virtual <br />monoculture of Alder or Willow species <br />has regenerated, while in other circum- <br />stances mixed stands of species evi- <br />dent in the surrounding landscape are <br />present. On properties where riverside <br />fences have not been maintained post- <br />drainage and lands have been used for <br />grazing a healthy riparian zone has not <br />regenerated post-drainage often result- <br />ing in bankside erosion and bank slip- <br />page where livestock have ready <br />access. These observations clearly <br />illustrate that the fencing of channels <br />should be an integral part of drainage <br />operations at works stage. The value <br />of maintaining an undisturbed riparian <br />zone, in both fisheries and general <br />wildlife terms, even in undrained <br />channels has been highlighted by <br />many authors (Waters, 1968, Hynes, <br />1970, Karr and Schlosser, 1978 and <br />others). <br />4d. Retention of Excavated Bed <br />Materials <br />Significant quantities of stone materi- <br />als may be required to carry out the <br />post-drainage fisheries rehabilitation <br />programme. It is suggested that the <br />material from bedrock areas and <br />spawning gravels excavated in the <br />course of drainage works be retained <br />for this purpose where possible to re- <br />duce costs. <br />5. POST-DRAINAGE FISHERIES <br />REHABILITATION PROGRAMMES <br />5a. A Strategy <br />Apart from the bank fencing, reseed- <br />ing and planting programme it is rec- <br />ommended that physical in-stream <br />fishery rehabilitation works be delayed <br />for two years post-drainage for the fol- <br />lowing reasons. While backwater <br />analysis allows one to predict the <br />likely effects of the drainage pro- <br />gramme, the recovery of the channel <br />is dependant on a number of ecologi- <br />cal, physical and hydrological factors <br />which may interact in unforseen ways <br />post-works. <br />Modifications to drainage design <br />may be required at works stage to ac- <br />commodate other public or private in- <br />terests e.g. abstractions or local <br />amenity parks. Consequently the <br />exact nature of the works schedule <br />and its effects on the channel in physi- <br />cal terms cannot always be antici- <br />pated.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.