Laserfiche WebLink
?q` INTRACTABLE CONFLICT/ <br />CONSTRUCTIVE CONFRONTATION <br />PROJECT <br />Developing Constructive Approaches for <br />Confronting Seemingly Intractable Conflicts <br />CONFLICT RESOLUTION CONSORTIUM University of Colorado <br />Working Paper 93-11, August 17, 1993' <br />THE EVOLUTION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS, INCREMENTAL CHANGE, <br />AND THE PROGRESSIVE RESOLUTION OF INTRACTABLE CONFLICT <br />By Larry MacDonnell <br />Director, Natural Resources Law Center <br />As I prepared to speak here, I thought about much of the <br />work that I'm involved in. My background is in the natural <br />resources area--natural resource allocation decision making, <br />especially as it relates to water resources. So I come at things <br />with that perspective. <br />We have made a lot of very fundamental decisions in this <br />country about rights that individuals have concerning the use of <br />land and natural resources, including water. Those decisions <br />have been based on a set of ideas about what would be best for <br />society. In particular, we have created an assortment of property <br />interests in resources. These property interests are the source of <br />a great deal of conflict in the natural resources arena. <br />Historically, in the United States, resource allocation <br />decisions were based on the belief that individual ownership of <br />resources was the best way to gain the societal benefits that we <br />wanted from those resources. These benefits revolved primarily <br />around economic development. Consequently, we carved land <br />areas into relatively small pieces that had little to do with many <br />of today's environmental concerns. But they did have a lot to do <br />with other values we were emphasizing--economic development <br />being first and foremost, along with other more abstract values <br />such as individual interests and even liberty, in some people's <br />perspectives. <br />Now we are struggling with the long-term effects of this age- <br />old policy. The decisions we have made over the last several <br />hundred years to carve up our lands without regard to what <br />we now recognize to be very key dimensions of those lands-- <br />for instance, habitat preservation or ecosystem dynamics-are <br />causing considerable conflict. Out here in the West, we can <br />see this dispute in its full glory because there is no place that <br />this issue gets fought more intensely than here. <br />Some of us now recognize that it may have been a <br />fundamental mistake to give to individuals the belief that <br />they have some sort of exclusive domain over a small chunk <br />of the earth. But many others disagree. I don't think many <br />people in this country would take back the decision to create <br />private property. It remains a fundamental American value. <br />Now we are trying to come to grips with what it means <br />to be the holder of private property. This is at the heart of <br />many environmental conflicts today. What is the real <br />meaning of this thing called a "property right?" There are <br />those who look at the idea of "property rights" in a very <br />19th-century sense: that these are in fact the exclusive <br />domain of the holders of those rights. The traditional notion <br />of property is that the one holding the property has an. <br />exclusive right to the enjoyment of that property, and that <br />they can exclude others. You are familiar with that approach <br />in the homes that you own. You take for granted the idea <br />that the piece of property on which your house sits is your <br />little domain. It is something that you can put a fence <br />t This paper is an edited transcript of a talk given by Larry MacDonnell for the Intractable Conflict/Constructive Confrontation <br />Project on April 10, 1993. Funding for this Project was provided by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and the University <br />of Colorado. All ideas presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Consortium, the University, <br />or Hewlett Foundation. For more information, contact the Conflict Resolution Consortium, Campus Box 327, University of Colorado, <br />Boulder, Colorado 80309-0327 Phone: (303) 492-1635, a-mail: crc@cubldr.colorado.edu. <br />0 1993. Confect Resolution Consortium. Do not reprint without permission.