Laserfiche WebLink
<br />68 <br />relative to the basins, slow enough for the river to cut the canyons which still exist <br />today. No evidence of ponding r lakes along the mainstream south of Needles (River <br />Mile 245) exists, but major wash systems draining adjacent mountain ranges and <br />channel braiding in the river valleys were common. A series of two aggradations and <br />degradations have occurred with the last aggradations be-inning 10,000-15,000 years ago. <br />During these changes in riverbed elevation, the slope stayed about the same near 1.7 <br />ft drop per linear mile of river. The river character changed dramatically though, <br />from a system moving pebble- to cobble-sized gravel to one moving a median-particle <br />size of 44 microns which is silt (Metzger et al., 1973). High flow events, generally <br />peaking May-July, created new gravel bars and renovated old ones annually. The area <br />of gravel substrate was primarily upstream of Parker, Arizona with the exception of <br />wash fans from lateral drainage areas. Similar bar development occurred in major <br />tributaries, only on a smaller scale. <br />The literature indicates that razorback sucker once migrated considerable dis- <br />tances and concentrated in large numbers near the mouths and up into the tributaries, <br />presumably to spawn (Jordan, 1891; Hubbs & Miller, 1953; Sigler & Miller, 1963). <br />Recent information indicates specific substrates are selected for spawning (Linda Ulmer, <br />pers. comm.) approximating substrates similar to historic bars or wash fans. The <br />confluence areas of major tributaries and the mainstream (wash fans included) may <br />have provided the loose, clean substrate during the late or post runoff periods on <br />the Colorado River. Gravel on newly formed or active bars would have good percola- <br />tion through interstices and spawning adults could move substrate easily during the <br />deposition of gametes. <br />During the period 1909-1938, seven dams were built on the lower Colorado River <br />which has resulted in colder, but more uniform water temperatures extending longer <br />into the spring, and the warming trend into the summer (post runoff) is slower. <br />Peak flows are now later into the summer and there is an inverse relationship between <br />flow and temperature. As flows increase to meet irrigation/power demands temperatures <br />are cooler and peak flows are not adequate to renovate or create bars. Migration <br />routes to the majority of tributary streams in the upper and lower basin have been <br />blocked. Reservoirs along the system where remnant sucker populations exist are aging, <br />substrate is silted in and compacted, and temperature regimes are variable. Channel- <br />ization in river segments between dams has reduced backwaters and potential spawning <br />and rearing habitats. Spawning observations in 1980 and 1981 in Senator Wash Reser- <br />voir and Lake Mohave were over lap-zone gravel areas (Linda Ulmer pers. comm.; <br />W. L. Minckley, pers. comm.) which are continually cleaned of silt by wave action. <br />Only in the Yampa River (Colorado) is the channel substrate and temperature near <br />natural conditions and now headwater storage projects in that drainage are proposed <br />(R. Valdez & E. Wicks, pers. comm.). It was estimated that razorback sucker range <br />was limited to elevations near or below 5,000 ft in Colorado (Ellis, 1914), and <br />that only a limited amount of stream habitat there was below that elevation, and the <br />majority of the river downstream has been altered. <br />LIFE HISTORY REVIEW <br />Maturity in razorback sucker (X. texanus) appears to begin around 5-7 years <br />of age (Tel. L. Minckley, pers. comm.; L. Courtois, pers. comm.) and spawning occurs <br />at temperatures 12-180C in January through April depending on the weather, water <br />operations and location along the system. Spawning depths from 0.5-3.0 meters are <br />most common. Dams now block migration and now only specific locations provide <br />spawning substrate in the lower river'(Loudermilk, 1982, in press). Only a small per- <br />centage of gonad contents are released during each spawning act, and there are