My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9594
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9594
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:12:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9594
Author
Colorado Division of Wildlife and e. al.
Title
Procedures for Stocking Nonnative Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />' updates to these documents will guide the use of floodplain ponds. <br /> These documents include: Reconnaissance Inventory and <br /> -Prioritization of Existing and Potential Bottomlands in the Upper <br /> Colorado River Basin 1993-1994 (Irving and Burdick 1995): Levee <br /> Removal Strategic Plan (Lentsch et al. 1996): Genetics Management <br /> Guidelines (Williamson and Wydoski (1994): Genetics Management Plan <br /> (Wydoski 1995) and annual propagation plans prepared in accordance <br /> with this plan: Augmentation Plan for the Razorback Sucker in the <br /> Middle Green River 1996-1997 (Wydoski 1996): Stocking Plan for <br /> Razorback Sucker in the Upper Colorado and Gunnison Rivers (Burdick <br />i et al. 1995): and all future stocking plans prepared through the <br />! Program. <br /> 11. Ponds are considered to be outside a designated floodplain if they <br /> are naturally above the floodplain in question or if they lie in <br /> the floodplain in question but have FEMA approved dikes <br /> functionally separating the pond from the floodplain. <br /> 12. Concurrent with implementing these stocking procedures, the <br /> Recovery Program will conduct a peer-review study to evaluate the <br /> effectiveness of the Interagency Standardized Monitoring Program <br /> (ISMP) to detect changes in the survivability and/or abundance of <br /> routinely stocked fish. Unless the study demonstrates that the <br /> ISMP is effective for tracking nonnative fishes, a program would <br /> have to be implemented to do so. If it is determined, by peer <br /> review analysis by the respective State and the Service, that <br /> nonnative fish escapement is occurring from an approved location, <br /> then routine stocking of that species in that location would be <br /> discontinued. Subsequent stockings at that location would then <br /> require case-by-case review by the State wildlife agency and the <br /> <br />j Fish and Wildlife Service (until the escapement problems are <br /> corrected) to ensure that escapement has been adequately addressed. <br />I IV. <br /> 1. Nonnative fish species that occur and are managed by stocking in <br /> the Upper Colorado River Basin can be routinely stocked (i.e., are <br /> not subject to procedures outlined in Section IX) in the <br /> locations/situations identified within this section. Stocking of <br /> nonnative fish species in these locations/situations are considered <br /> to be consistent with recovery of the endangered fishes. <br /> Explanations of the terms/acronyms are provided in Appendix B. <br /> 2. Trout can be routinely stocked directly into riverine habitats <br /> upstream of critical habitat. Stocking of trout into private <br /> floodplain ponds is also allowed. Stocking of trout within <br /> riverine portions of critical habitat is not allowed under these <br /> procedures. <br /> <br />1 5 <br />t
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.