My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4203
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
4203
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:10:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
4203
Author
Colorado River Water Conservation District.
Title
Summary of Issues and Preliminary Hydrologic Assessment of the Agreement to Subordinate the Shoshone Hydropower Water Right.
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M N <br />right at Shoshone. (The transmountain diversions referred to are in the Roaring <br />Fork basin, which discharges into the Colorado River below the Shoshone <br />diversion.) Ruedi Reservoir, which is also junior to the Shoshone water right, <br />benefits from its return flows. The largest group of junior industrial rights <br />were appropriated in the 1950's to serve the oil shale industry. These rights <br />remain conditional pending a change in the world wide demand for petroleum <br />products. Municipal users with junior rights downstream include the Ute Water <br />Conservancy District, City of Grand Junction, and Clifton Water District. <br />SUBORDINATION BENEFITS TO DENVER AND OTHERS <br />Complete removal of the Shoshone call during the non-irrigation season <br />would result in a "free river" allowing diversions by any upstream water users <br />who are in a position to make winter season diversions or additions to storage. <br />The most significant of these upstream users are the large transmountain <br />diversion projects. Municipal and snowmaking diversions could take place without <br />making augmentation releases from storage, subject to water availability in the <br />stream after the transmountain diversions have taken their share. <br />Selective subordination of the Shoshone water right to Denver alone would <br />result in Denver's continued diversion while other water users were curtailed <br />during the winter season. Any water right located upstream from the Shoshone <br />Power Plant would be justified in claiming injury under such an operation since <br />Denver's depletions would reduce the flow at Shoshone and prolong the season in <br />S <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.