Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> <br />The current plans for containment place primary <br />emphasis on keeping the species East of the 100th Meridian, <br />making the states located on this longitude the first line <br />of defense; emphasis on public education for identification <br />and control of spread; and encouraging state cooperation and <br />partnerships. In order to discuss these ideas, all Western <br />states met in March and formed the Western States Zebra <br />Mussel task force, and agreed to implement education and <br />' monitoring programs. Some states are already running these <br />programs. In May the 100th meridian states will begin <br />interdiction activities along the Interstate highways. In <br />the very near future many other plans will be implemented by <br />states in partnerships, such as monitoring high-risk waters, <br />extending the education efforts, coordinating activities <br />with other state agencies, etc. <br />The Nuisance Species Control Act (1996) provides <br />' funding for various types of control activities (see <br />sections 1203,1204) wherein a group of states can develop a <br />plan for control of nuisance species, hold public hearings, <br />obtain approval of the Governor(s), and then receive <br />approval of the nuisance species control task force. The <br />program can receive federal matching monies on a 75%-25% <br />basis. There seems to be every reason therefore, to get <br />funding contributions from utility, generating, water <br />supply, and irrigation companies. Efforts by the CRFWC, for <br />instance, to contact organizations like the Colorado River <br />' Water Users, CRSP, CAP, etc. for help in funding and <br />programs could be especially important. <br />In response to the Council assignment last year, the <br />staff (Mike Stone) has put together a Colorado Basin Plan <br />draft. It covers some activities which may not be <br />' appropriate to address immediately, but the plan would then <br />be flexible to allow future actions should conditions <br />warrant(see appendix B). After discussion, the Council, on <br />' a motion made by Shroufe and seconded by Molini, requested <br />the staff to have each state be prepared at the January 1999 <br />meeting to have their revisions to this draft, and funding <br />' estimates, according to their state situation, so that a <br />single coordinated plan could be written with a state matrix <br />for individual state actions. <br />' The Council requested staff have each state designate <br />a person which Mike Stone and Dirk Miller (WY) can contact. <br />They will coordinate with each state to review and comment <br />on the draft Nuisance Species Control Plan, and then put <br />together a draft document for Council review in January. <br /> <br />3 <br />