My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8063
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8063
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:03:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8063
Author
Colorado River Fish and Wildlife Council.
Title
Minutes, Colorado River Fish and Wildlife Council - April 22-23, 1998.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
Las Vegas, Nevada.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I. . APPENDIX H <br />' 2. Additional information on breeding habits, food habits, genetics, and possible hybridization <br />would be most useful. <br />' 3. Additional information on habitat parameters, predator interactions, and response to pathogens <br />is needed. <br /> 4. Additional information on breeding habits, food habits <br />genetics <br />competitive interaction between <br /> , <br />, <br />B. woodhouseii and B. punctatus, and possible hybridization between B. w. woodhouseii and <br /> B. w, australis would be most useful. <br /> <br /> Nevada <br />' 1. Anecdotal, literature, field notes, museum records; state heritage data base for some species. <br /> 2. Updated distribution and status assessment, habitat requirements, age and population structure, <br />' genetics. <br /> 3. Some populations are presumed stable, some isolated populations may be vulnerable and <br /> possibly declining. <br /> 4. Occurrence records and taxonomical identification for this species are unclear. The presumed <br /> R. yavapaiensis population in adjacent Littlefield, AZ is now thought to be R. onca; additional <br />i <br /> genet <br />c and taxonomic evaluation is needed to assess the Rana complex in the Virgin River <br /> basin and determine if Nevada occurrence of R. yavapaiensis is valid. Nearest recent confirmed <br /> R. yavapaiensis records are for Grand Canyon, AZ. <br />' 5. Known extant NV populations only occur at isolated springs on Lake Mead NRA. Further <br /> assessment of sites below Hoover Dam and in Virgin River corridor is needed to define status <br /> <br />' and distribution of R. onca. <br /> 6. NIPS is actively managing and implementing conservation actions for Lake Mead NRA sites. <br /> Evaluation of putative R. onca Black Canyon leopard frog populations below Hoover Dam is <br /> funded and in progress. <br /> 7. Existing management actions for extant Lake Mead populations are probably sufficient for short- <br /> term needs, but conservation needs for Black Canyon populations have not been addressed. <br />1 Further evaluation of the leopard frog complex in the larger Virgin River/Lake Mead drainage is <br /> needed to determine the extent and validity of the R. onca taxonomic group. <br />' New Mexico <br /> 1. Recently published book Amphibians and Reptiles of New Mexico: all records based on <br />' museum specimens. <br /> 2. Numerous agency reports, all <1985; museum records; Recently published book Amphibians <br />' and Reptiles of New Mexico. <br /> 3. Distribution, threats, interaction with B. woodhouseii. <br /> 4. Distribution, reproduction and habitat information, etc. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.