My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8063
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8063
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:03:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8063
Author
Colorado River Fish and Wildlife Council.
Title
Minutes, Colorado River Fish and Wildlife Council - April 22-23, 1998.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
Las Vegas, Nevada.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Introduction <br />The Colorado River Wildlife Council, the coordinating organization for Colorado River basin <br />state wildlife Agencies, initiated in 1995 a basin-wide assessment of the status of, and level of <br />knowledge on, several native, sensitive but non-listed, non-game fish species which have <br />distributions encompassing more than one basin state. The long-range goal of this assessment <br />project was to develop cooperative, rangewide conservation strategies and plans for those <br />species, with the objective of preventing future new species listings under ESA. Successful <br />implementation of coordinated conservation strategies among participating states should go a <br />long ways towards preventing such listings, reducing conflicts with other ongoing wildlife <br />management and recovery strategies. This assessment, coordinated by the State of Utah, was <br />finalized in early 1997 and has been a useful tool for identifying gaps in species knowledge and <br />areas for cooperation and coordination among member states. <br />As an extension of the assessment process for native fishes, the Council in 1996 identified <br />native amphibians as the species group of next highest concern for possible future listings. <br />Council representatives felt strongly that native amphibians represent a particularly large <br />window of vulnerability for future listing efforts, and that a better understanding of the overall <br />status and level of existing information on species that occur in more than one basin state will <br />assist all of the agencies in addressing amphibian conservation needs. Although it is probably <br />premature to consider developing coordinated management strategies among states for these <br />species at this time, a clearer understanding of their distribution and status in the basin, and of <br />gaps in that knowledge, will assist all of the member basin states. <br />Beginning in April 1997, all member states were contacted regarding information on resident <br />native amphibian species. A contact person in each state was provided with two items. The <br />first was a list of amphibian species native to the Colorado River basin which may occur in two <br />or more basin states. The distribution information was based only on simple range maps from <br />common sources. The list included some species which are presumably widespread and <br />common, but information was requested from each state to indicate the accuracy or inaccuracy <br />of this assumption, and the indicated distributions. The second attachment was a questionnaire <br />regarding available status and other information on individual species, and an assessment of <br />conservation needs. <br />Responses were summarized and provided to the Council in January 1998, and additional <br />information from Utah added to this draft. One additional species, the Western chorus frog <br />Pseudacris triseriata, was added to the summary as a result of multiple responses, and an <br />additional eight species were suggested for inclusion by the State of Arizona (see notes). <br />These eight species are not included in the draft summary tables since other basin states have <br />not yet been solicited for status information. <br />Once initial responses have been received from all basin states, a further draft of this document <br />will attempt to summarize status and general conservation needs for included amphibian <br />species, and provide recommendations for those species, if any, which would most benefit from <br />coordinated management strategies or agreements on a multiple-state or basin-wide basis. <br />Analysis <br />To be added <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.