My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8063
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8063
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:03:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8063
Author
Colorado River Fish and Wildlife Council.
Title
Minutes, Colorado River Fish and Wildlife Council - April 22-23, 1998.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
Las Vegas, Nevada.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />facilities can be operated and maintained while the fish continue their recovery, even after <br />the specific agreements requiring non-federal participation lapse. <br />• Establishes a cost-ceiling and a schedule for funding and implementing the capital projects <br />needed to recover the federally-protected species. <br />The Upper Colorado River Program has served as the "reasonable and prudent alternative" to avoid <br />unacceptable "jeopardy" Endangered Species Act Section 7 decisions for more than 200 water <br />supply construction projects. These projects located in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming, allow an <br />aggregate capability to deplete more than 225,000 acre-feet of water per year from the Colorado <br />River basin. <br />Likewise, the San Juan River Program has served as the "reasonable and prudent alternative" for <br />Phase I of the Animas-La Plata Project (57,100 acre feet of future depletion) in Colorado and New <br />Mexico; and the Navajo Indian Irrigation project (133,000 acre feet of pre-program depletion) in <br />New Mexico. It will also provide alternatives for future development as "sufficient" progress is <br />made in the recovery of the endangered fish. <br />I think it is also worth noting that none of the bills that have been introduced in recent years to <br />amend the Endangered Species Act would change the need for these recovery programs. Indeed, <br />most of the amendments put even greater emphasis on local efforts to protect threatened and <br />endangered species. These recovery programs have effectively given a greater voice to state <br />agencies, as well as development and environmental interests, and have shifted the focus of our <br />efforts from the regulatory scene to the development of solutions for important resource conflicts. <br />While the legislation directly benefits the upper Colorado Basin recovery programs, the lower states <br />recognize the important precedent it establishes. I hope that you will support this legislation, and <br />lend your voice to those of federal, state, local and environmental leaders who believe that the <br />recovery program offers the best opportunity to address water needs and environmental obligations <br />in the and West. <br />Very truly yours, <br />Tohn W. Mumma, Director, Colorado Division of Wildlife <br />Chairman, Colorado River Fish and Wildlife Council <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.