My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8063
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8063
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:03:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8063
Author
Colorado River Fish and Wildlife Council.
Title
Minutes, Colorado River Fish and Wildlife Council - April 22-23, 1998.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
Las Vegas, Nevada.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />L? <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />APPENDIX B <br />The spiny water flea, a likely ballast water introduction, is a tiny crustacean with a sharply <br />barbed tail spine. The northern Europe native was first found in Lake Huron in 1984. The spiny <br />water flea is now found throughout the Great Lakes and in some inland lakes. Although <br />researchers do not know what effect the invader will have on the ecosystem, resource managers <br />suspect that the water flea competes directly for food with small fish such as perch. <br />The zebra mussel, another ballast water introduction, is one of the best known invaders of the <br />Great Lakes region and other areas of the country where it has spread. This aquatic nuisance <br />species has caused serious economic and ecosystem impacts. The zebra mussel, a highly <br />opportunistic mollusk, reproduces rapidly and consumes microscopic aquatic plants and animals <br />from the water column in large quantities. The potential impact on the fishery can be profound <br />due to changes in food availability and spawning areas, to name a few. Economic impacts are as <br />pervasive as the ecosystem impacts. Great Lakes municipalities, utilities and industries due to <br />the infestation of zebra mussel in their intake/discharge pipes B have significant costs associated <br />with monitoring, cleaning and controlling infestations. According to a recent economic impact <br />study, each of 84 Great Lakes water users reported average total expenditures of $513,600 over <br />the five-year period from 1989 to 1994 (Hushak et al., 1995). By the end of this century, water <br />users across the country are expected to spend between $2 billion and $3 billion cleaning clogged <br />water intakes (Ruiz et al., 1995). Commercial and recreational vessels and beach areas also are <br />vulnerable to the negative impacts of the zebra mussel. <br />Nonindigenous aquatic plants also have been introduced to the Great Lakes region and inland <br />waters. Purple loosestrife is a wetland plant from Europe and Asia that was introduced to the <br />east coast of North America in the 1800s. Purple loosestrife invades marshes and lakeshores, <br />replacing cattails and other wetland plants. This nonindigenous plant is unsuitable to meet <br />' habitat needs S such as cover, food or nesting sites S for a wide range of native wetland animals <br />including ducks, geese, rails, bitterns, muskrats, frogs, toads and turtles. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />Eurasian water milfoil, unintentionally introduced to North America from Europe, has spread <br />into inland lakes primarily by boats. Milfoil can proliferate in high densities in lakes, producing <br />habitat conditions that cause serious impairments to commercial fishing and water recreation <br />such as boating, fishing and swimming. The plant's surface canopy also can out-compete and <br />eliminate native aquatic vegetation, as well as threaten native fish and wildlife populations. <br />Numerous aquatic nuisance species have been introduced and dispersed in the Great Lakes and <br />inland waters of each state by various pathways. The environmental and socio-economic costs <br />resulting from ANS infestations will only continue to rise with further ANS introductions. <br />Although an awareness of the problems caused by aquatic nuisance species is emerging, the <br />solutions are not readily apparent. This comprehensive state management plan for <br />nonindigenous aquatic nuisance species provides guidance for management actions to address <br />the prevention, control and impacts of aquatic nuisance species that have invaded or may invade <br />the Great Lakes region and inland state waters. <br />I DRAFT ANS Plan for CRFWC (April 23-24, 1998) <br />Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.