Laserfiche WebLink
' APPENDIX B <br />aquaculture and fishery species along with their associated (free-living and parasitic) organisms, <br />release of organisms associated with pet industries or pest management practices, recreational <br />boating, bait handling, water transport, and ornamental and landscape practices. <br />Nonindigenous aquatic species are causing significant economic and ecological problems <br />throughout North America. Zebra mussels, Asiatic clams, Atlantic salt marsh cordgrass, purple <br />loosestrife, and other invasive species threaten western waters. A 1996 report by The Nature <br />Conservancy emphasizes that invasive, non-native species are one of the leading threats to the <br />I ecological integrity of our nations forests, grasslands, and waterways. Examples of problems <br />that are caused by nonindigenous species in fresh and marine waters include: <br />• The Central Arizona Project estimates that an infestation by zebra mussels will <br />increase its operation and maintenance costs $4 to $5 million annually. This does not <br />' reflect cost to farmers, other customers and water treatment plants nor the financial <br />and environmental effects of the additional use of ground water that will occur to <br />avoid impacts. Major Great Lakes water users spend $30 million annually to monitor <br />and control zebra mussels. <br />• The Japanese oyster drill has decreased aquaculture profits 55 percent, increased <br />production costs 17 percent, and causes 25 percent mortality in out planted seed <br />oysters. <br />• The invasion of the Asian clam has altered the food web in San Francisco Bay by <br />depleting phytoplankton stocks to the detriment of important salmon and striped bass <br />fisheries. <br />' A newly introduced species, if it becomes established through reproduction, can disrupt the <br />natural ecosystem balance by altering the composition, density and interactions of native species. <br />This disruption can cause significant changes to the ecosystem, such as alterations to the <br />' foodwebs, nutrient dynamics and biodiversity. New introductions also can cause costly socio- <br />economic impacts even if effective prevention and control mechanisms are established. <br />Eventually, each newly introduced species will become integrated into an ecosystem that is in a <br />I constant state of flux; or the introduced population will not survive and become extinct (New <br />York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 1993). <br />(Note: The remainder of this section can probably be completely deleted but we will need to add a similar section <br />with Colorado River Basin examples.) <br />' Approximately 10 percent of the Great Lakes' nonindigenous aquatic species have resulted in <br />significant negative ecological and economic impacts. The following examples portray the <br />extensive ecological and economic impacts caused by aquatic nuisance species that have been <br />introduced into the Great Lakes region. <br />The invasion of the sea lamprey in the 1940s has resulted in substantial economic losses to <br />recreational and commercial fisheries, and has required annual expenditures of millions of dollars <br />to finance control programs. During the 1940s and 1950s, the sea lamprey, a top predator which <br />DRAFT ANS Plan for CRFWC (April 23-24, 1998) Page 3 <br />