Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />provided for low oxygen, loss of power and general alarm conditions. Three domestic <br />residences are strategically placed outside the facility perimeter security fence at locations <br />which allow for observation into critical areas of the hatchery complex by off-duty facility <br />workers and their families. <br /> <br />COSTS <br /> <br />The feasibility level design prepared for this study includes a hatchery building, rearing <br />ponds for propagation and augmentation stocks, ponds for holding broodstock and for <br />refugia, a research building and outside research facilities, three on-site residences for <br />hatchery workers, a visitor center and aquarium building, and other related facilities. This <br />design represents a state-of-the-art facility. The design includes specific design and cost <br />information for the key components of the facility. This information could be used to assist <br />in the final selection of specific recovery facility components, therefore it is not anticipated <br />that final costs for a facility would equal the totals presented in Tables 6 through 10. The <br />cost components could also serve as a starting point for the preliminary design. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Estimated costs for capital construction were developed on the basis of feasibility level <br />design information for a comparable unit or system basis and are shown in Tables 6, 7, and <br />8. The tables are for production Scenario 2 - 300,000 fish, for each of the three water <br />supply types. The estimates are in 1992 dollars. The costs are segregated into the three <br />major components of the recovery facility: the fish hatchery; the broodstock and refugia <br />holding ponds and the research facility. These cost estimates do not include acquisition <br />costs for land or improvements, including any existing hatchery facilities. <br /> <br />Estimated operation and maintenance costs have been developed and are also presented in <br />Tables 6, 7 and 8. These costs represent all functions to be performed on-site with the <br />exception of the research program. Details on the extent of research programs, due to <br />changing priorities over time prevent accurate estimates of costs. These estimates would <br />remain relatively constant regardless of site selection. Operation and maintenance costs for <br />the research building which are associated with water quality, pathology and other services <br />connected with the propagation of fish are included. <br /> <br />Full time personnel requirements for the facility have been estimated for each production <br />scenario. Personnel categories include: facility manager, assistant facility manager, <br />laboratory technician, fish culturist, maintenance engineer, plant engineer and receptionist <br />The estimated number of full time equivalent personnel are 6, 9, and 10 for production <br />scenarios 1, 2 and 3 respectively. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Tables 6, 7 and 8 present the relative costs for the major components of the recovery facility <br />and the total cost for each of the water supply types for production scenario 2 - 300,000 fish. <br />Table 9 presents the estimated total cost for the recovery facility for each of the three <br />production scenarios for each water supply type. Table 10 presents the estimated cost for <br />just the core facility for each of the three production scenarios for each water supply type. <br />Costs listed in Tables 9 and 10 are total capital construction costs plus a 2S percent <br />contingency factor. <br /> <br />14 <br />