Laserfiche WebLink
a <br />committee formally again recommends the council reconsider and allow the use <br />of triploid grass carp as stated in the council's policy. <br />. Will Geer then requested that the technical committee members present provide. <br />by the business meeting this afternoon a language for an action item that <br />would adequately address the triploid and diploid separation for action by <br />the council. <br />Coordinated Resource Management Planning <br />Chairman Geer introduced Mr. Kent Smith, California Department of Fish & Game <br />to address the council on the concept of coordinated resource management <br />planning for riverine and other habitats along the river system. <br />Mr. Smith described his role with the California department with two <br />. different responsibilities: the state program manager for non-game programs <br />and as representative for a fourteen agency agreement called called <br />Coordinated Resource Management Planning. In connection with his non-game <br />job, he has worked with the problems presented along the Lower Colorado River <br />and been involved with talks between Arizona, Nevada, the Bureau of <br />Reclamation and the Fish & Wildlife Service. It rapidly became apparent <br />concerns were more than just endangered birds and fish, but were for <br />habitats. There were concerns also for backwater areas which have <br />historically supported high quality, recreational fishery opportunities. It <br />became obvious that a system similar to California Coordinated Resource <br />Management Planning would provide an opportunity for coordinated planning and <br />the greatest ability to successfully pool ideas and resources to produce <br />something positive for these resources. <br />The planning process looks at large blocks of land, most often multiple <br />ownership and often different management, philosophies and responsibilities <br />as a unit and planning cooperatively based on the interests, responsibilities <br /> and authorities for those blocks of land. When planning for large blocks, <br /> one can then plan for the diverse use of any resources that occur. With the <br /> general acceptance of this concept by the people involved, it was decided <br /> that the greatest need and interest was looking at riperian and backwater <br /> areas. The first large block selected was the Lower Colorado River from Lake <br /> Mojave to the international border. The California department is putting out <br /> a considerable amount of funding for the opportunity to coordinate a planning <br /> approach and may add to that in a future effort. Key habitat areas on both <br /> sides of the river are identified and site descriptions written for those <br /> habitat areas. It is planned those site descriptions will then be used as a <br /> basis for bringing the whole concept to meetings where all interests are <br /> involved. So far, the only players have been the agencies. Other key <br /> players that need to be involved in this are local communities, Arizona state <br /> lands, California state lands, Indian lands and several others. Those other <br /> players are currently being identified. <br /> This concept was, presented in April, 1988 to a tri-city meeting of <br /> commissioners from Arizona, Nevada and California. Subsequent to that <br /> meeting, each of these commissions supported a resolution in support of the <br />. <br /> Coordinated Resource Management and Planning approach on the Lower Colorado <br /> River. At about the same time, the concept was presented to the Colorado <br /> River Wildlife Council Technical Committee, which unanimously endorsed ti-.e <br /> idea of sending a resolution to this council in support of the CRP effort on <br /> <br />9