Laserfiche WebLink
-6- <br />a <br />The other recommendation by the P&P Committee was for funds to prepare a <br />camera-ready copy of a poster that addresses the problem of the release of <br />aquaria fish into the wild. This poster shows a little boy with his pet gold <br />fish going to public waters to release it (Appendix E). The poster would <br />hopefully make people aware that we need to not release these fish into the <br />wild. The camera-ready copy would be available to each Council state to add <br />its own logo, name and whatever slogan might be appropriate. The camera-ready <br />copy would save the states a little money, but would be most worthwhile in <br />giving something to the states so that they could proceed immediately without <br />the breakdown that often occurs with development of art and design work. A <br />photo-ready copy could be made for about $60 and there would be an additional <br />charge of approximately $14 for each state copy with necessary slogan and <br />names. Council participation, then, would be approximately $158 if all states 41 <br />indicated a need for a copy. <br />The Technical also discussed new information on bait fish transportation. In <br />the past, California has provided a thorough species and disease inspection of <br />live bait fish being shipped into, through or out of California. Normally <br />other basin states have approved transportation in their state after <br />confirming that the shipment was from California because of their confidence <br />in this disease program. Because of volume and other work demands, California <br />now is unable to inspect the large majority of these fishes. Also, some <br />dealers are now importing fish which are uninspected, putting their company <br />name on them as California product and reshipping. Everyone should now be <br />aware that just because the fish comes from California, doesn't mean that it <br />is necessarily inspected for species or disease identification. <br />Recommendations of the Technical Committee pertaining to P&P Committee were <br />accepted for consideration by the Council. <br />J. Wildlife-Habitat Committee Report: <br />41 <br />Since the approval by the 1986 Council, a Wildlife-Habitat Committee nucleus <br />has met and generated a list of members from the states. Membership will be <br />left open to those states indicating a need and desire. They have started to <br />compile a list of native mammals and are currently preparing to build on <br />results of the new floodway legislation. They are very much interested in 41 <br />interstate cooperation for revegetation work on the diminishing habitats along <br />the Colorado River. The main thrust of that Committee appears to be toward <br />enhancing all habitat communities in the riparian zones along the river. The <br />Technical Committee made a specific assignment to report at the 1988 Technical <br />about selenium problems and studies along the river. <br />is <br /> <br />a