My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4205
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
4205
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:49:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
4205
Author
Colorado River Wildlife Council.
Title
Minutes, Colorado River Fish & Wildlife Council.
USFW Year
1984.
USFW - Doc Type
April 2-3, 1984.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i i <br />Unfortunately, it was not distributed to all the conservation <br />agencies until recently. The emotion ran high. The most volatile <br />reaction came from people in Colorado. A coordinating committee has <br />been established and has been given a strong specific charge. Members <br />are imy regional director, the two regional directors from the Bureau <br />of Reclamation, Cliff Barrett and Billie Martin out of Denver, the D&R <br />head from Utah; the D&R head from Colorado, and Warren White from the <br />Wyoming Governor's office. <br />The charge is something like - gentlemen, get your agencies to- <br />gether and work out something on the Colorado fishes versus water de- <br />velopment problems. It is strong. We feel we have done the job in <br />getting this elevated in terms of what we have, and think it will be <br />a way to get it resolved. <br />It is a very preliminary plan, such that what finally comes out of <br />the whole operation may be somewhat different. The coordinating com- <br />mittee has set up two sub-committees, one for hydrology and one for <br />biology. The two sub-committees will meet on April 6. <br />Everything is on a tight time frame. They are hoping to have a <br />draft plan, I am not sure what they will call it by late next fall. <br />The preliminary plan is more or less on hold until all the agencies <br />get a chance to look at a new approach, or decide what we have is <br />pretty good and add to it. <br />I will let Jim Johnson report on the Lower Basin and then we will <br />answer questions. <br />Lower Basin <br />Johnson - I am one of several people here representing Mike Spear <br />in Albuquerque. I brought a couple of informational circulars--one shows <br />some of the fish we are talking about. Of the eight fish shown in the. <br />leaflet, seven are Colorado endemics, but most of the discussion, from <br />my understanding is to be around the big-water fishes. The squawfish, <br />the humpback chub, bonytail chub, and the razorback sucker. At least <br />three of the four are shown. The other leaflet deals with Dexter Na- <br />tional Fish Hatchery. <br />In the Lower Basin, Region 2, of the Fish and Wildlife Service, <br />we have approached recovery of the Colorado River big-water fishes <br />differently from the Upper Basin, Region 6. Region 6 still has habitat <br />for the species in most cases. The Lower Basin tends to have lost the <br />habitat. In only one case do we have good habitat left, and that is <br />for the humpback chub in the Grand Canyon at the mouth of the Little <br />Colorado. It is protected by the Park Service and we have gone in and <br />done what we thought the recovery plans told us to do, then drawn back <br />and left the population to go as it should. <br />27 <br />d
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.