My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9668
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9668
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:49:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9668
Author
Crowl, T. A. and e. al.
Title
Bonytail Draft 1998 Annual Report, February 2000.
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
Logan, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
of hydroelectric power and the implementation of water and fish management practices, <br />the Colorado River basin began to change. <br />These various impoundments acted as "river blocks", trapping the fish. This effectively <br />fragmented the native fish habitat. The impoundments stopped fish migration as well <br />as the passage of genetic material beyond them and changed the historical variations <br />in flow, temperature, and turbidity that these fish evolved in. Seasonal and interannual <br />variations in flow were greatly reduced while daily fluctuations increased. Mean annual <br />temperatures were lowered, salinity increased, and the water in the tailwaters of the <br />dam were made clear and colder. Some important fish habitat has either disappeared <br />altogether or has been converted from lotic to lentic habitat (Hickman 1983). The basin <br />has taken on a different form altogether and it appears as though some of the <br />environmental factors which stimulate spawning reactions in the native fish no longer <br />occur in today's Colorado River Basin (citation ). <br />Water development was not the only change that has occurred in the Colorado River <br />Basin. By the mid 1900's sport fishing became a popular pastime as well as an <br />economic factor. States became eager to create lucrative sport fisheries, and <br />introduced exotic sport fish that were favorites of anglers. The upper Green River was <br />even poisoned with rotenone, to remove native "trash" fish and make way for sport <br />fishes (Holden 1991). Ironically, many of these "trash" fish were endemic, and four are <br />currently listed as either threatened or endangered. Many nonnatives were introduced <br />and quickly made the basin their home. This created problems for the native fishes as <br />they were now forced to compete with multiple species of nonnative fish for food and <br />space, deal with predation pressures from a plethora of predatory fish new to the basin, <br />and adapt to a very different habitat. The changes in the hydrograph related to river <br />development coupled with the introduction of nonnative species has exaserbated the <br />species decline. Minckley and Meffe (1987) found that nonnative fish gradually <br />dominated native fish during low discharges, and during high flows, native fish were <br />dominant in number. Valdez (1985) noted similar findings. Flooding may prevent <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.