My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9595 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9595 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:48:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9595
Author
CRCT Task Force.
Title
Conservation Agreement and Strategy for Colorado River Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarki pleuriticus) in the States of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming.
USFW Year
1999.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />DEFINITIONS AND ISSUES <br /> <br />A. Geographic Management Unit: <br /> <br />The range of the Colorado River cutthroat has been divided into 14 geographic management <br />units (GMUs) to bring a finer level of resolution to descriptions of population and habitat <br />distribution and related maintenance and restoration work. These GMUs reflect common sense <br />divisions of large areas based on river drainages. They do not necessarily reflect important <br />differences in genetic variability in the fish based in geography or other types of adaptation to <br />specific environments. As knowledge of the genetic variability of the fish increases, planning and <br />management should become increasingly based on conservation of the range of distinct population <br />segments that comprise the genome of the subspecies. This conceptual approach is assumed to be <br />analogous to evolutionarily significant units (ESUs) as surninarized by Monroe and Nielsen (1994). <br /> <br />B. Genetic Purity: <br /> <br />Colorado and Wyoming have adopted the following definitions of genetic purity in order to <br />provide consistency in interpretation of the various techniques which are available to assess genetic <br />purity: <br /> <br />A+: A pure population with unique phenotypic, genetic or historical qualities that suggest <br />special consideration and use for it in conservation planning. <br /> <br />A: A pure population with no evidence of hybridization with non-native salmonids. <br /> <br />A-: A population that is phenotypically representative but that has slight differences <br />from the norm due to natural variation or human-caused movement of CRCT from <br />other areas. <br /> <br />B+: A population where less than 5% of genetic markers or phenotypes indicate <br />hybridization with non-native salmonids. <br /> <br />B: A population where 5% or more but less than 10% of genetic markers or phenotypes <br />indicate hybridization with non-native salmonids. <br /> <br />B-: A population where 10% or more but less than 15% of genetic markers or <br />phenotypes indicate hybridization with non-native salmonids. <br /> <br />C: A population where 15% or more but less than 20% of genetic markers or <br />phenotypes indicate hybridization with non-native salmonids. <br /> <br />D: A population where 20% or more of genetic markers or phenotypes indicate <br />hybridization with non-native salmonids. <br /> <br />March 1999 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.