My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7999
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:48:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7999
Author
Colorado River Wildlife Council.
Title
Minutes, Colorado River Fish & Wildlife Council.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
April 23-24, 1996.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
s <br />BAIT FISH REGULATORY CHANGES IN ARIZONA <br />Mr. Joe Janisch (AZ) provided the Council a brief <br />overview of the current situation with respect to live bait <br />fish in Arizona. Arizona has many licensed commercial fish <br />rearing facilities which sell minnows for bait throughout <br />the Colorado Basin and other points in the United States. <br />It would be extremely unlikely that, based on this industry, <br />the legislature or commission would recommend doing away <br />with live bait in Arizona. Also, the Arizona Department has <br />been dealing with conflicts associated with interstate <br />transport of different bait species into Arizona. The <br />Arizona bait industry and other state wildlife agencies have <br />been concerned with Arizona exports because of pathogens, <br />diseases, mixed species, etc. Arizona is now considering <br />promoting a single fish species as the only bait fish. <br />Ideally, such a fish would be a native species found <br />throughout Arizona and perhaps further. It would need to be <br />functional, easily reared, transportable and, ideally, even <br />increase the ease of rearing and profitability for the <br />industry. In the latest discussions, two fish have been <br />rated the highest priority. Probably the most attention is <br />being paid to the Sonoran sucker, which is native throughout <br />Arizona, has high fecundity, easy to raise, and the largest <br />is about 2 or 3 pounds. Since it is ubiquitous, it will <br />probably never be a candidate for native species listing. <br />The fish minnow industry has agreed that the future probably <br />will be for certain approved species and they are generally <br />in agreement with this particular fish. In this past year, <br />the Arizona Department has taken eggs and is currently <br />engaged in experimental rearing to determine rearing methods <br />and ease of providing a cultured product. The second sucker <br />in consideration would be a different species of the same <br />genus, the desert sucker. <br />The group discussed ramifications at some length. <br />Nevada expressed concern about the Sonoran sucker, which is <br />not found in Nevada, but that the desert sucker is native to <br />Nevada and would be considerably the best choice of the two <br />for bait fish introduction. A considerable amount of the <br />bait fish used in Nevada comes from Arizona. There was also <br />concern about the sucker as an effective bait species. <br />Arizona has not considered any testing in this regard, <br />relying on information from the midwest which shows that for <br />bass fishing, suckers are the preferred bait species. <br />Arizona will be testing the hardiness of the Sonoran sucker <br />in low oxygen environments such as hauling, in buckets, etc. <br />to help determine the choice of bait species. In regard to <br />several questions about the sucker's effect on the <br />environment, especially changed environments, Mr. Janisch <br />reported that in the central part of Arizona there are <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.