My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9367 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9367 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:44:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9367
Author
Colorado Water Workshop.
Title
Proceedings
USFW Year
1992.
USFW - Doc Type
Colorado Water Workshop July 22-24, 1992.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Endangered Species Act <br />Panel Discussion <br /> <br />Moderator: Fred Wetlaufer, Member, Western Colorado Congress <br /> <br />Question: I have some comments that I would like to make. The first <br />is about the Endangered Species Act. It smacks of totalitarianism to <br />me, in terms of the penalties and the lack of economic consideration. <br />I would submit that if we used incentives as opposed to penalties that <br />we would harness the human potential and that would work wonders in <br />terms of saving species. Secondly, will the Endangered Species Act <br />stop the overall decline of species by itself? I submit that it will <br />not. Patrick said that the problem was the human ability to <br />accelerate the demise of species. Therein lies the problem. I do not <br />hear anyone stressing that basic problem. Population is a terrible <br />term, but we as ranchers we are always faced with the fact that we <br />cannot overgraze, or over utilize our property without consequences <br />and we deal with that. I do not think we are dealing with that. I <br />would submit that humans are an endangered species, not because their <br />numbers are -decreasing, but because their numbers are increasing. <br /> <br />Question: I have one question for Bill. Where does all this excess <br />water that Dave Miller talks about come from? <br /> <br />Bill Trampe: Ed, I am not sure. <br /> <br />Question: My name is Jimmy King. I represent the community of Ship <br />Rock, New Mexico, which is located about thirty miles west of <br />Farmington, just downstream from the Navajo dam. Janice mentioned the <br />San Juan River several times. There have been large flows of water <br />from the Navajo Dam released recently that wiped out many of our <br />diversion dams along the San Juan River towards Ship Rock all the way <br />down to Enice, Utah. There are many people in my community who live <br />by cultivating farmlands. Does the Endangered Species Protection Act <br />have any financial assistance available to repair these diversion dams <br />for us so that we can continue irrigating our farmlands? How soon, <br />where and when? Right now the water levels have been high and they <br />wiped these dams out. There is no money available to rebuild them. <br />There are four or five chapters that live near the San Juan River who <br />have passed resolutions stating this problem. We have seen it coming. <br />They still went ahead with it and like Patrick said, it is the law. <br />If it is going to be law, is there money to help rebuild some of these <br />things. That is what I am here for. I want to find out what we can <br />do to keep this from happening again. Are there any plans to rebuild <br />the diversion dams? <br /> <br />Janice Sheftel: Thank you for bringing that problem to our attention. <br />It is not something I had heard about. I realize that there have been <br />increased reservoir releases to determine flows that would be best for <br />the Colorado Squawfish. I was not aware of the conflicts, however, <br />I do not know if the Service has money two help in such matters. We <br />will be glad to investigate what the action of the flows has done. <br />I did not realize there was a problem. I think those who are involved <br /> <br />93 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.