9367 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

is an excellent representation of the views of both the tribes and potential water marketers, and water consumers here at the conference. I would only underscore the point that demography and geography seem to be conspiring to keep the water in the Colorado River basin running down into California. Politics Eighth, we have, of course, politics. Consider the relative power of the seven basin states, and as John put it, we do not have the votes. The numbers are interesting and revealing. California has 54 votes in the House of Representatives. Colorado has six. Adding the votes of the other five basin states, that is to say Colorado and all of the others except California, and the total comes to 33. This imbalance of power will affect where the water ends up. Is the Law of the River obsolete? If obsolescence is a continuum somewhere between very new and very old, between unchanged and completely changed, clearly the Law of the River falls somewhere on that continuum. It falls somewhere towards the change, but not necessarily obsolete. It is inconceivable to me that the 1922 signers of the Colorado River Compact envisioned even one-tenth of the social, legal, political, and environmental forces that now determine where Colorado River water is going to end up. Someone asked me during the break whether I thought it is Congress, or the states re-compacting, who can directly affect the Compact. I think that is a one-sided debate. David Getches, for one, believes that Congress can explicitly override, or amend a compact, by a piece of explicit legislation. Others, and I inferred from Jim Lochhead's remarks that he is among them, believe that Congress can affect pieces of legislation, such as the Colorado River Storage Act, or the Basin Act that was interpreted in Arizona versus.California, but not override the Compact. That is a debate unto itself. I do not think that it ultimately determines or controls the eight factors that I have talked about today. The real salient aspect of where water ends up depends on those things short of amending the Compact, short of rendering it totally obsolete in a legal sense, or superseding it. I think the real forces are those eight. It was interesting that 400 years ago that Shakespeare said, "it's a brave new world." Even that was many "new worlds" ago. I think that if one takes a fresh and broad view of what the Law of the River is, what constitutes it in a very broad and sociological sense, you would have to conclude that it is a "brave new world" for the Law of the River. Is it obsolete? I think not. However, I do think that the 1922 Compact signers would scarcely recognize it. Lori Potter's comments have been edited by the staff at the Colorado Water Resources Research Institute. Ms. Potter has been out of the country and unable to personally edit her remarks. 23