My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9370 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9370 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:43:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9370
Author
Colorado Water Workshop.
Title
1996 Colorado Water Workshop.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Western State College of Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />BENEFITS OF LEASES <br /> <br />During the early stages of the leasing program, MFWP realized that leases would have to be <br />obtained on small streams rather than on larger rivers. The large quantity of water required to <br />substantially improve flows and the many water rights required would make leases on larger <br />rivers too complicated and it would be difficult to avoid adverse effects. Consequently, all of <br />the leases so far obtained are on small tributary streams that are used for spawning by the larger <br />river fish. By increasing the spawning potential and numbers of young fish that go back to the <br />rivers, the leases increase the river fish populations and, subsequently, improve angling <br />opportunities. <br /> <br />FWP does not make cost/benefit analyses of water leases. Although the costs can be accurately <br />determined, the economic benefits to the stream or larger river systems are difficult to calculate. <br />Predictions can be made of the increase in fish populations due to improved spawning and <br />dollar values for angling use can be estimated. However, the predictions are subject to large <br />error. Because of this poor accuracy, MFWP does not make these predictions. Instead, we <br />monitor the spawning streams before and after a lease and determine if more fish are produced. <br />If so, we assume benefits accrue to the fisheries from the standpoint that, if there are more fish <br />for the angler, fishing will improve and there will be economic benefits that results from <br />increased angler use. <br /> <br />A single lease mayor may not provide all the water that is needed to improve streamflows. In <br />all of the streams except Mill Creek, the leased water is sufficient. However, Mill Creek is a <br />larger tributary and will require additional leases to obtain an adequate base flow. <br /> <br />, MONITORING AND PROTECTION OF LEASES <br /> <br />Because "first in time is first in right", the priority date of leased water is extremely important <br />to its protection in the stream. All seven of the leases have the first, or one of the very earliest, <br />water rights on the stream, giving instream flows priority over other uses that divert water from <br />the channel. This particularly important in low flow years. <br /> <br />The first two Mill Creek leases have been implemented for three years. The third Mill Creek <br />lease was implemented in 1995. The leases are monitored by MFWP with the assistance of a <br />water commissioner who administers all the rights on the creek. The commissioner makes sure <br />the leased rights are maintained in the stream reach by protecting them from junior <br />appropriators. <br /> <br />The Blanchard Creek lease has also been in effect for three years. The only water user on the' <br />stream is the lessor and no protection of the leased water from others is needed. <br /> <br />The Tin Cup Creek lease was first implemented in 1995. A water commissioner administers the <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.