Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'" <br /> <br />ways to maintain and improve streamflows to provide fish populations that will satisfy the <br />angling public. Because many important fishing streams are already overappropriated, <br />streamflows can only be improved by putting some of the already appropriated water back into <br />the stream. <br /> <br />This is the concept of water leasing. <br /> <br />Why is water leasing important? The answer requires a brief discussion of the habitat needs of <br />fish. Generally, we think of stream fish habitat in terms of three components: (1) The physical <br />channel itself, (2) the quantity of water required to fill the physical channel, and (3) the quality <br />of that water. Instream flows represent the water quantity component of stream habitat. One <br />means to provide that component is to lease existing diversionary water rights and put that water <br />back into streams. This makes previously unavailable water available to improve the habitat for <br />fish. <br /> <br />However, Montana water law prevented this concept from being tried until 1989. <br /> <br />NOTE: Leasing is not the only means to acquire instream flows in Montana. Other programs <br />by which MFWP has acquired instream flows include the water reservation process established <br />by the 1973 Montana Water Use Act and "Murphy Rights" authorized in legislation passed by <br />the 1969 legislature. However, both these processes only allow the acquisition of unappropriated <br />water. A priority date is established which protects the status quo of streamflows from future <br />appropriation by junior water users, but does nothing to put water back into streams that suffer <br />from low flows. <br /> <br />LEASING LEGISLATION <br /> <br />The most controversial natural resource issue that came before the 1989 Montana Legislature <br />was HB 707, the water leasing bill. The issue arose primarily as a result of the 1988 drought's <br />impact on stream fisheries. The bill was strongly supported by the environmental community. <br />The introduced bill was strongly opposed by the agricultural community and was, at one point, <br />rejected by the Legislature. However, it was revived and, through amendments, approved in the <br />closing days of the session. It was signed into law in May, 1989. <br /> <br />A sample of newspaper headlines before and during the 1989 legislative session provides a <br />feeling of the debate that took place prior to the bill's approval: <br /> <br />"Water Fight: Irrigators, environmentalists see battle in '89 legislature" . Great Falls Tribune, Sept. 12, 1988. <br /> <br />(Then Governor) "Stephens supports water leasing bill". Ravalli Republic (Hamilton), Feb. 15, 1989. <br /> <br />"Debate boils over proposed water bill: Ranchers and recreationists disagree about the bill's intent and power". <br />Ravalli Republican, Feb. 20, 1989. <br /> <br />2 <br />