Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-' <br /> <br />THE DEVELOPMENT OF WATER POLICY IN COLORADO <br />by JAMES S. LOCHHEAD <br /> <br />There are two viewpoints generally expressed in Colorado con- <br /> <br />cerning statewide water resource planning. Some suggest the <br /> <br />state has no "water plan", and that a plan is needed to direct <br /> <br />water development in a more ef f icient, logical, and envi ronmen- <br /> <br />tally sensitive manner. Others assert this state does have a <br /> <br />water plan--the doctrine of prior appropriation. Both positions <br /> <br />are inaccurate. In fact, Colorado has existing and evolving <br /> <br />water policies, and an institutional framework for establishing <br /> <br />such policies that goes far beyond the individual right of <br /> <br />appropriation. Water use and development in this state is very <br /> <br />directly influenced by public policies, which are generated <br /> <br />through legislative, executive and judicial processes. <br /> <br />The legislature has created water policy agencies, and pro- <br />mulgates direct water policy. Executive agencies implement <br />legislative directive, are used by the legislature as resources, <br />and develop their own policies and rules within their authority. <br />The judiciary has developed case law and interpreted statutory <br />law in a manner that reflects the evolution of public policy. <br />Although the system can be improved, it remains flexible enough <br />to accomoda te change wi thout the complete overhaul that some <br />interests suggest is necessary. Certainly, the Colorado system <br />is much more flexible and accountable than would be a super water <br />agency purporting to act in the public interest, or a single <br />water plan which would dictate development. <br /> <br />-1- <br />