<br />The Ties That Bind:
<br />Systems
<br />Daniel F. Luecke and
<br />
<br />Physical and Economic Linkages Among Colorado's Water Resources
<br />
<br />David W. Fanning - Environmental Defense Fund
<br />Introduction
<br />
<br />The economic history of any region is determined by its natural
<br />resources, its climate, its topography and, often, by chance. As the economy
<br />of a region (like a state) grows, it moves beyond subsistence and becomes more
<br />integrated with surrounding regions. The same phenomenon occurs within
<br />regions as basic industries like mining, manufacturing, and sometimes
<br />agriculture create the demand for transportation and other infrastructure and
<br />the variety of services that accompany a region's growth. Costs are reduced,
<br />bottlenecks eliminated and further economic development facilitated. In
<br />Colorado, this drama has been played out in little more than 100 years. Where
<br />Colorado goes from here depends to some extent on how it reached its current
<br />level of development, how it allocates its resources and energies in the
<br />future, and how it manages the subregion linkages that have become
<br />increasingly important over time.
<br />
<br />Colorado's geography has made it, literally, the roof of the United
<br />States. As Coloradans are fond of pointing out, four major river systems
<br />(Colorado, Sout.h Platte, Arkansas, and Rio Grande) and seven minor ones (North
<br />Platte, Laramie, Republican, San Juan, Animas, White and Yampa) originate in
<br />Colorado (Foss, 1978). In total, t.he average annual flow of surface water in
<br />the State is about 16 mi 11 ion acre-feet. A ma,jority of that water flows out
<br />of the State to pass through or form t.he boundary of 18 other states. To
<br />protect its interests in a share of this water, Colorado is party to almost
<br />half the existing interstate water allocation compact.s and retains a claim to
<br />5.5 million of the 16 million acre--feet flowing in its streams (Foss, 1978).
<br />(In addition, Colorado has an estimated 2 billion acre feet of recoverable
<br />ground water ill the State [Tregat'then, 1983]).
<br />
<br />Colorado does not. currently use aU the surface water to which it is
<br />entitled, especially in the Colorado River Basin, and there are feat'S that
<br />lower basin st.ates, principally California and Arizona, will use Colorado's
<br />water and be unwilling to relinquish it when Colorado wants to develop it. Of
<br />the water Colorado does use, 80 percent. is used for irrigation and 20 percent
<br />is allocated for municipal, industrial and other uses (Foss, 1978).
<br />
<br />It. is an almost unchallenged tenet of semi-arid states like Colorado that
<br />economic development and water development are inextricably linked to one
<br />another. The idea is simple: economic development depends on a substantial
<br />and cheap source of water. No one will argue that water is not a factor in
<br />economic growth--water must obviously be available for growth to occur. But
<br />Colorado economic history makes it clear that other factors have greater
<br />importance. Today, western water is no longer just another commodity. There
<br />is an appreciation for its intrinsic life and beauty and a growing awareness
<br />that water in the stream may be as valuable in the economic context of the
<br />State as water diverted or stored for "beneficial use".
<br />
<br />The purpose of this paper is to trace a few of the physical and economic
<br />factors that have shaped economic development in the State and to identify the
<br />relationship between those factors and the development of water systems.
<br />Historically, water developers were constrained only by the prior
<br />appropriations doctrine. Today, more is at stake. Water development has
<br />implications for every region of the State. Water used along the Front Range
<br />affects skiers in Summit County, hotel owners in Glenwood Springs, farmers and
<br />ranchers in Grand Junction, and maybe most importantly, the economic interests
<br />of Colorado itself.
<br />
<br />Presented for Colorado Water Workshop, July 27-29, 1987
<br />Western State College, Gunnison, CO
<br />
<br />***See authors
<br />note on last page.***
<br />
<br />- 1 -
<br />
|