Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The Ties That Bind: <br />Systems <br />Daniel F. Luecke and <br /> <br />Physical and Economic Linkages Among Colorado's Water Resources <br /> <br />David W. Fanning - Environmental Defense Fund <br />Introduction <br /> <br />The economic history of any region is determined by its natural <br />resources, its climate, its topography and, often, by chance. As the economy <br />of a region (like a state) grows, it moves beyond subsistence and becomes more <br />integrated with surrounding regions. The same phenomenon occurs within <br />regions as basic industries like mining, manufacturing, and sometimes <br />agriculture create the demand for transportation and other infrastructure and <br />the variety of services that accompany a region's growth. Costs are reduced, <br />bottlenecks eliminated and further economic development facilitated. In <br />Colorado, this drama has been played out in little more than 100 years. Where <br />Colorado goes from here depends to some extent on how it reached its current <br />level of development, how it allocates its resources and energies in the <br />future, and how it manages the subregion linkages that have become <br />increasingly important over time. <br /> <br />Colorado's geography has made it, literally, the roof of the United <br />States. As Coloradans are fond of pointing out, four major river systems <br />(Colorado, Sout.h Platte, Arkansas, and Rio Grande) and seven minor ones (North <br />Platte, Laramie, Republican, San Juan, Animas, White and Yampa) originate in <br />Colorado (Foss, 1978). In total, t.he average annual flow of surface water in <br />the State is about 16 mi 11 ion acre-feet. A ma,jority of that water flows out <br />of the State to pass through or form t.he boundary of 18 other states. To <br />protect its interests in a share of this water, Colorado is party to almost <br />half the existing interstate water allocation compact.s and retains a claim to <br />5.5 million of the 16 million acre--feet flowing in its streams (Foss, 1978). <br />(In addition, Colorado has an estimated 2 billion acre feet of recoverable <br />ground water ill the State [Tregat'then, 1983]). <br /> <br />Colorado does not. currently use aU the surface water to which it is <br />entitled, especially in the Colorado River Basin, and there are feat'S that <br />lower basin st.ates, principally California and Arizona, will use Colorado's <br />water and be unwilling to relinquish it when Colorado wants to develop it. Of <br />the water Colorado does use, 80 percent. is used for irrigation and 20 percent <br />is allocated for municipal, industrial and other uses (Foss, 1978). <br /> <br />It. is an almost unchallenged tenet of semi-arid states like Colorado that <br />economic development and water development are inextricably linked to one <br />another. The idea is simple: economic development depends on a substantial <br />and cheap source of water. No one will argue that water is not a factor in <br />economic growth--water must obviously be available for growth to occur. But <br />Colorado economic history makes it clear that other factors have greater <br />importance. Today, western water is no longer just another commodity. There <br />is an appreciation for its intrinsic life and beauty and a growing awareness <br />that water in the stream may be as valuable in the economic context of the <br />State as water diverted or stored for "beneficial use". <br /> <br />The purpose of this paper is to trace a few of the physical and economic <br />factors that have shaped economic development in the State and to identify the <br />relationship between those factors and the development of water systems. <br />Historically, water developers were constrained only by the prior <br />appropriations doctrine. Today, more is at stake. Water development has <br />implications for every region of the State. Water used along the Front Range <br />affects skiers in Summit County, hotel owners in Glenwood Springs, farmers and <br />ranchers in Grand Junction, and maybe most importantly, the economic interests <br />of Colorado itself. <br /> <br />Presented for Colorado Water Workshop, July 27-29, 1987 <br />Western State College, Gunnison, CO <br /> <br />***See authors <br />note on last page.*** <br /> <br />- 1 - <br />