Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />told them. <br />Into this deeply polarized situation, a few people like Dick <br />Ormsbee began to drop seeds of a different way of doing things. <br />Ormsbee has insisted for years that what an irrigator wants is <br />just what a fish wants; a good supply of cool, clean water. It <br />may seem surprising that a farmer would care whether the water <br />was cool or not, but in fact, warm water nurtures weeds in <br />irrigation ditches, which means that less water gets to the <br />crops. Ormsbee has obviously thought about all this, and in a <br />voice as quiet and deep as one of those shady pools, he concludes <br />that, "It is well that the fish and the farmer want the same <br />things from the river.." <br />They don't, of course, want exactly the same things. The <br />farmers do need to put the water in different places than the <br />fish would like it to be. But Ormsbee's point is that the <br />differences are not as clear-cut as farmers and fishermen often <br />think they are. The challenge, not only on the Bitterroot but <br />throughout the Clark Fork basin (and in other basins too), is to <br />get the people who are involved with the river to understand that <br />what divides them is less important than what they have in <br />common. That is a tough challenge, but it is one which is being <br />met in creative ways throughout the basin. <br />Tom Ruffano, a rancher from the stevenville area, sits with <br />Ormsbee on the Conservation District Board of Supervisors. <br />Ruffano's family has ranched in the valley for several <br />generations, so be, although a young man himself understands <br />quite well the attitude of the old-timers. The core of their <br />attitude is deeply entrenched in western water law. It boils <br />down to a simple message from farmers to fishermen: "We were <br />here first." Not only are they old-timers, but they are also <br />survivors. They have persevered by knowing how to get the river <br />to yield them a living. Ruffano argues that these old-timers <br />"look down on the fishermen because they don't depend on the <br />water for a living." <br />Ormsbee doesn't directly depend upon the river for a living <br />either, but he can see how much of the valley does-and not just <br />through agriculture. He recognizes, for example, that the <br />Bitterroot has become a major retirement center- which it clearly <br />would not be without the attraction of the river. People who <br />just want to play on the river, or fish in it, or grow old next <br />to it may not depend upon the river for a living, but their <br />growing number mean that the valley's economy increasingly <br />depends upon the river. After observing the river and its <br />economy for over sixty years, Orsmbee reaches a simple <br />conclusion: "Since the river is the basis of the economic life <br />of the valley, we have to take care of it." <br />Orsmbee tried to do his part by serving on the Conservation <br />District Board. But he and other board members began to see that <br />the care of the river would have to include more parties. <br />Orsmbee tells how he and Tom Murphy showed up early for a board <br />meeting one warm summer evening several years ago. As they sat <br />in the shade of a tree outside the meeting hall, talking about <br />the river, the local fisheries manager for the Montana Department <br />of Fish, wildlife and Parks walked by. "We sat him down .between <br />