Laserfiche WebLink
<br />to September. The number of prey items/stomach declined from July to August in <br />fi sh > 150 mm. At the same time, the abundance of organ isms in the drift <br />declined over the same time interval. A similar trend was observed by Allan <br />(1981) in Cement Creek, Colorado. Our results differed for fish ~ 150 mm where <br />the peak number of prey consumed/fi sh was in August when a moderate 1 evel of <br />drift density was observed. <br /> <br />With progression from July to September, the proportion of terrestrial <br />insects in the diet of brook trout> 150 mm increased from 2.9% to 36.2%. At the <br />same time, the proportion of the drift comprised of terrestrial insects tended to <br />increase. The terrestri a 1 insect component of brook trout di et was in Deer <br />Creek, Idaho (Griffith 1974), but a seasonal trend, as in Telephone Creek, was <br />not described. However, Reed and Bear (1966) found terrestrial insects to <br />comprise 50% of the diet of brook trout in Archuleta Creek, Colorado, but this <br />site was at a lower elevation (2,900 m) in a valley that could not be described <br />as subalpine. <br /> <br />Differences in diet composition were observed between the two size classes <br />of brook trout. The smaller size class (~ 150 mm) tended to consume smaller <br />aquatic insect prey, especially chironomid larvae and the early instars of <br />Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera. The larger fish (> 150 mm TL) tended to consume <br />larger insect prey, particularly Trichoptera larvae, elmid beetle larvae and <br />adults, and terrestri a 1 insects. Sel ect i on for 1 arge invertebrates has been <br />demonstrated among brook trout> 150 mm by Allan (1978). <br /> <br />Selection for Trichoptera larvae, Coleoptera larvae and adults (primarily <br />e 1 mi d beetles), as well as for terrestri a 1 insects, was observed by Griffith <br />(1974) and Allan (1981). Allan (1981) also observed selection for Coleoptera by <br />brook trout in Cement Creek, Colorado. Griffith (1974) observed brook trout <br />feeding near the substrate, thereby making encounters with large, heavy aquatic <br />insects more likely. This may explain the observed selectivity for caddis fly <br />larvae and elmid beetles in Telephone Creek. However, it is also possible that <br />brook trout were not selecting Coleoptera and Trichoptera in the drift, but .were <br />feeding on these relatively large, conspicuous organisms while the prey were on <br />the substrate. <br /> <br />Allan (1981) suggested that three factors may govern the diet compositions <br />of stream-dwelling brook trout: prey availability, prey size and individual <br />specialization among fish. Many of our observations tend to corroborate that <br />prey avail abil ity and prey size i nfl uence di et compos it ion, but our data also <br />suggest that the manner in which these factors govern the diet may vary with fish <br />size and time of year. Our observations suggest that organisms on the substrate, <br />as well as in the macroinvertebrate drift, should be evaluated as available prey <br />items, especially for brook trout> 150 mm. <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />LITERATURE CITED <br /> <br />Allan, J.D. 1978. Trout preda.tion and the size composition of stream drift. <br />Limnology and Oceanography 23:1231-1237. <br /> <br />15 <br />