My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8099
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8099
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:33:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8099
Author
American Fisheries Society.
Title
Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting, Colorado - Wyoming Chapter, American Fisheries Society.
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
March 5-6, 1986.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />bladder problems. Four fish were placed in each live car and lowered to a depth of 35 feet. After 5.5 <br />hours, the live cars were hauled to the surface. All fish were in extremely good condition. They <br />were active, brightly colored and showed no signs of stress. All the fish swam away normally after <br />their release. The fish used in the experiment ranged in length from 19.6 to 23.3 inches and in <br />weight from 2.4 to 4.5 pounds. Tags from two of the eight lake trout used in the experiment have <br />been returned. <br /> <br />During the spring of 1985, three lake trout were placed in a live car overnight. Conditions of <br />these fish were similar to fish described in the 1982 experiment. All three fish were in excellent <br />condition after being hauled to the swface from a depth of 65 feet. <br /> <br />Table 2 summarized the condition of 1985 tagged lake trout at their time of release and how <br />they returned to the creel through February 14, 1986. The condition of tagged lake trout was <br />categorized upon their release as excellent, good, fair and poor, based upon their response and <br />general condition when they were released. Of the 400 lake trout released, 64% were in excellent <br />condition, 25% in good condition, 7% in fair condition and 4% in poor condition. No fish were <br />released that were judged to be fatally injured. Table 2 shows that lake trout returned at almost <br />identical rates to the percent tagged in each category. Returns of the fish in the fair and poor <br />categories are encouraging and add validity to the study. <br /> <br />A population estimate was calculated from the 1982 harvest data and tag return data using a <br />modified Peterson method. The harvest of lake trout in 1982 was 8,997 and based upon a return of <br />21 tagged lake trout out of a possible 212. The population of catchable lake trout was 87,117 :I:. <br />17,225 at the 95% confidence interval. Angler exploitation, based upon the harvest and population <br />estimate in 1982 was 10.4%, while angler exploitation from the 1982 tagging study was 9.9%. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />The number of lake trout tagged during the fall of 1981 and spring of 1982 was disappointing. <br />It was estimated that at least 400 tagged fish were needed to provide adequate returns. Valuable <br />know lege concerning the time of year tagging should occur, lake trout habitat, netting and tagging <br />procedures was gained. Nets with the mesh sizes 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 inches caught most of the lake <br />trout. The 4.0 inch mesh nets were not used in 1985. The Floy FD68B plastic anchor tags were <br />abandoned in favor of the Ploy cinch-up tag to lower tag loss and add confidence to the study. <br /> <br />The exploitation study is based upon the voluntary return of the $5.00 reward tags. The $5.00 <br />reward was used as an incentive for anglers to return all tags from tagged fish which were caught. <br />How many tagged lake trout have been caught and the tags not returned is a question we cannot <br />answer at this time. Weare now asking all anglers contacted during creel census interviews if they <br />have or know someone who has caught a tagged lake trout on Flaming Gorge during creel <br />interviews. This has been responsible for the return of at least a dozen tags which may not otherwise <br />have been returned. The Wyoming Game and Fish Department is working on a non-response <br />correction factor which can be applied to this study. We hope to have an answer to this question by <br />the end of 1986. It may be that a larger reward needs to be offered in order to get most of the tags <br />returned. <br /> <br />The literature is rich with examples of tagging studies which have failed because of poor angler <br />response concerning the return of tags. Green et al. (1983) estimated tag return rates directly by <br />surrepititiously implanting reward tags into fish which had already been caught during creel surveys. <br /> <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.