Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Harvest of lake trout increased annually until 1980 when it stabilized at just over 10,000 fish. <br />Harvest in 1981 declined to approximately 8,000 fish and then increased to 9,000 fish in 1982. <br />Table 1 summarizes the harvest of lake trout from Flaming Gorge Reservoir from 1978 through <br />1982. During this time period, there was an average of 0.26 lake trout (1.6 pounds) harvested per <br />surface acre. McAfee (1966) states that in order to maintain a wild population indefinitely, lake trout <br />populations in most inland Ontario lakes can sustain a yield of slightly less than 0.5 pounds/surface <br />acre. Harvests from Flaming Gorge are over three times the sustained harvest recommended by <br />McAfee (1966) for inland Ontario lakes. Preliminary harvest data from 1984 and 1985 indicate that <br />lake trout harvest has increased slightly and will be the highest number yet recorded. <br /> <br />Harvest regulations for lake trout changed from an eight fish/day limit prior to 1978, to a two <br />fish/day limit in 1978. In 1982, the creel limit was modified so only one fish of the total trout daily <br />limit could be 20 inches or larger. Although the limit on lake trout remained at two fish/day, the new <br />regulation essentially limited the catch of trophy lake trout to one fish/day. Daily limits and <br />possession limits are one in the same. <br /> <br />During 1981, the Wyoming Game and Fish Department and Utah Division of Wildlife <br />Resources became concerned about the future of the lake trout fishery in Flaming Gorge Reservoir. <br />Publicity about the trophy lake trout fishery resulted in increased fishing pressure directed toward the <br />lake trout. Both management agencies wondered whether the new harvest regulation (one fish 20 <br />inches or greater) would be restricive enough. To adequately analyze the impact of the harvest of lake <br />trout, a tagging study was devised to study movement, assess angler harvest (exploitation), analyze <br />population dynamics and study age and growth in the reservoir. The primary objective of the tagging <br />study is to evaluate the exploitation of lake trout from Flaming Gorge and to design more restrictive <br />harvest regulations, if necessary, to preserve the quality of the fishery. Initially, the tagging study <br />was to be done on a limited basis during fall netting in 1981 and intensively during.the spring of <br />1982. Preliminary harvest data during 1984 caused increased concern that lake trout exploitation was <br />higher than rates calculated during 1982, and the study was reinitiated during the spring of 1985. <br />Lake trout tagging will also occur during the springs of 1986-1988 to collect sufficient data to analzye <br />exploitation rates and evaluate harvest regulations. <br /> <br />METHODS <br /> <br />Fish were tagged in October, November and December of 1981 and April and May of 1982 <br />with Floy plastic anchor tags (FD68B) with the inscription "$5 REWARD UTAH FISH AND GAME <br />SLC" and a serial number. The tags were inserted between the interneural spines below the dorsal fm <br />with a Floy tag gun which had a 29 mm needle. In April and May of 1985, Floy plastic cinch-up tags <br />with the inscription "$5 WYO. GAME AND FISH $ CHEYENNE, WY 82002" and a serial number <br />were used. The cinch-up tags were inserted between the last two interneural spines of the dorsal fin <br />with a hollow needle. The tag was then cinched up close to the body so it fit snuggly, but allowed <br />adequate room for growth. Antiseptic was then sprayed on the wound to prevent infection. Utah and <br />Wyoming participated in the lake trout tagging in 1981 an4 1982, while Wyoming tagged all the fish <br />in 1985. <br /> <br />Lake trout were captured using sinking monofilament exploratory gill nets. The nets were 200 <br />feet long by 6 feet deep. Three nets had a bar mesh of 2.5 inches. Three other nets had bar mesh <br />sized of 2.0,3.0 and 4.0 inches, respectively. Each of the three reservoir areas was sub-divided into <br />smaller zones arbitrarily so netting effort could be spread over the entire reservoir. Each zone was to <br />receive equal sampling effort so results would accurately reflect exploitation of the entire population <br />and not be biased by returns from heavily or lightly fished zones. Each zone was to be sampled <br /> <br />16 <br />