Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(12.4%) than the entire lot average (6.3%). If true, this indicates that <br />they were most likely dumped too early to be sufficiently trained to feed. <br />It is interesting to note that use of the fry sorter necessitated <br />a delay in the first cleaning of the rearing tanks. The delay was for up <br />to four days from the time of initial dumping. Initial observation indi- <br />cated the postponement had a positive effect on fry survival. This hypothe- <br />sis was further tested by deliberately delaying the first cleaning by three <br />to four days in all three production lots. Mortality over the test period <br />was then compared to historical averages for the two species over the past <br />five or six years (Table 1). <br />The results were somewhat dramatic; in the case of the brown trout, <br />mortality in the test lot was 29% lower than a 6-year average. For the fall <br />rainbows, test lot mortality in one case was 28% lower than a 5-year average. <br /> <br />Table 1. Mortalities <br /> <br />Lot # Run # Sorter Mort. First Cleaning Mort. %Mort. - 1st Inventory <br />20-82 1 <br /> 2 280 350 -0.4 (overrun) <br /> 3 <br /> 4 240 240 -2.9 <br /> Control N.A. 260 -8.7 <br />21-82 1 65 <br /> 2 210 72 2.6 <br /> 3 145 <br /> 4 105 42 6.0 <br /> Control N.A. 100 0.7 <br />22-82 1 <br /> 2 270 200 12.4 <br /> 3 <br /> 4 110 150 7.2 <br /> Control N.A. 90 6.3 <br />20-82 <br />Whole <br />Lot 184 (per tank) -3.1 (overrun) <br />21-82 <br />Whole 58 (per tank) 1.8 <br />22-82 <br />Whole 210 (per tank) 9.1 <br />Rbw. <br />Avg. 141 (per tank) 2.5 (N=5 ) <br />Brown <br />Avg. 105 (per tank) 12.8 (N=6 ) <br /> 83 <br />