Laserfiche WebLink
<br />stands, such as spruce/fir, only burn in holocaust conditions in western <br />Montana. Some experts have estimated that this type of riparian area <br />may have burned once every 400 years under natural conditions (Robert <br />Mutch, personal communication). Therefore, fire management plans and <br />prescriptions can ultimately influence beaver distribution. Fire manage- <br />ment plans currently tend to favor low risk burning conditions and call <br />for full scale suppression in conditions that would create these holo- <br />caust burns. Under this management scheme, we can expect beaver to con- <br />tinue to decline in distribution in these kinds of habitat. Prescrip- <br />tions or plans favoring intense burns in riparian areas would be expected <br />to favor beaver habitat in the long run. <br /> <br />Transportation Systems <br /> <br />Beaver activities frequently threaten to damage transportation facil- <br />ities in and adjacent to suitable riparian environment areas. In many <br />cases, these facilities were constructed in a period of beaver inactivity; <br />therefore, no special design considerations were incorporated. Stream <br />crossing structures, particularly if they constrict the channel width, are <br />often incorporated as part of a beaver dam. In other circumstances, <br />roadbeds become saturated as a result of the higher water tables created <br />by beaver ponds. The most common outcome of this situation is to dili- <br />gently remove the beaver colony. Removal of the problem beaver is, at <br />best, a temporary solution. Longer lasting solutions are available. <br />Several devices have been installed to prevent culvert blockage, and road- <br />beds can be raised or reconstructed to improve drivability. Preventive <br />transportation design effort appears to be the most effective tool in pro- <br />viding compatible transportation facilities with beaver habitat and beaver <br />activity. Avoidance of beaver habitat is often feasible by relocating <br />a stream crossing to a steeper gradient stream reach. Roads placed a few <br />feet higher on the slope above the riparian zone can eliminate the possi- <br />bility of saturated roadbeds. Stream crossing structures that are wider <br />than the channel width are less likely to become sites for beaver dams. <br />Failure to design for beaver activity in beaver habitat will usually lead <br />to expensive maintenance or elimination of the beaver resource. <br /> <br />ASSESSING FOREST OBJECTIVES WITH RESPECT TO BEAVER <br /> <br />Once the land manager or decisionmaker understands the relationships <br />of beaver to other resources, he or she can begin to evaluate the positive <br />or negative effects that beaver activity may have on his or her objectives. <br />One approach can be passive, accepting beaver activity when it occurs and <br />adjusting other land uses to be compatible with beaver. This form of <br />management accepts beaver as a natural part of the ecosystem and adjusts <br />Forest programs accordingly. A more active management approach is to <br />plan beaver activity as a management tool to improve wildlife, fisheries, <br />or recreation resources or to reduce impacts of other resource uses such <br />as regeneration timber harvest, prescribed burning riparian areas, or <br />planting of food species such as willows. Beaver populations are then <br />manipulated to provide the direct and indirect benefits that meet the <br />manager's objectives. <br /> <br />77 <br />