My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8097
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8097
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:33:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8097
Author
American Fisheries Society.
Title
Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting, Colorado - Wyoming Chapter, American Fisheries Society.
USFW Year
1983.
USFW - Doc Type
March 2-3, 1983.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />comm. 1982), one in Arizona (Ingebo 1971), and one in California (Rowe <br />1963). These studies involved the removal of mostly non-riparian vegeta- <br />tion, such as juniper and chapparal. The most detailed study (Rowe 1963) <br />was on Monroe Canyon Creek in California. Removal of 34 acres of woodland <br />vegetation and 4 acres of riparian resulted in significant increases in <br />streamflow. The removal of non-riparian, deep-rooted woodland plants was <br />thought to have been responsible for most of the flow increase observed. <br />In two other studies on perennial streams in Arizona, elevated summer <br />flows occurred after removal of valley bottom vegetation. Eradication of <br />cottonwood, willow and seepwillow along a grazed reach of Cottonwood Wash <br />resulted in summer streamflow increases equalling six percent over inflow <br />(Bowie and Kam 1968). In another study, the removal of a small amount of <br />riparian vegetation along the North Fork of Workman Creek had no effect, <br />but conversion of 80 acres of adjacent moist-site conifer to grass resulted <br />in an average 45 percent increase in water yield (Rich and Thompson 1974). <br /> <br />Livestock Grazing <br /> <br />Several studies show that removal of cattle from streamsides may result <br />in increased summer streamflow, even when riparian vegetation increases. <br />After fencing seven miles of Willow Creek in the Crooked River National Grass- <br />land in Oregon, change from intermittent to perennial flow has occurred after <br />six years (Winegar, pers. comm. 1982). While Willow Creek for five miles <br />above and below the exclosure is still dry in summer, there is now peren- <br />nial flow within the exclosure. Beaver have not yet made dams within the <br />exclosure. Fencing of McMeen Springs and McMeen Springs Creek, a tribu- <br />tary to Willow Creek has also resulted in perennial streamflow. <br />A similar finding has been reported on Camp Creek in Oregon. By 1974, <br />four miles of Camp Creek had been fenced from cattle grazing. Dramatic in- <br />creases in wildlife utilization, pronounced soil buildup, and recovery of <br />riparian vegetation was reported as a result (Winegar 1977). During the <br />droughts of 1977 and 1981, the West Fork of Camp Creek, which is the main <br />source of flow for Camp Creek, dried up. However, during these periods, flow <br />in Camp Creek began just within and persisted through the exclosure, and then <br />dried up just below the exclosure. Camp Creek now supports fish and beaver, <br />where none were present at the time of fencing (Winegar, pers. comm. 1982). <br />Change from intermittent to perennial flow on three small, spring-fed <br />Texas streams upon elimination of cattle grazing has also been observed <br />(McCollum, pers. corom. 1982). Big game species were not removed. Riparian <br />vegetation grew abundant at about the same time perennial flow developed. <br />It is unknown if flows from the springs increased. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Channel morphology, streamside soils and vegetation, and land uses <br />affecting these factors, can have important effects on the timing of flows <br />in small streams. Flow increases after removal of cattle, and after dams <br />have been constructed, show that vegetation management is only one alter- <br />native to management in valley bottoms for summer streamflow increase. <br />Summer flow increases after dam construction show that the potential <br />for instream and bank storage is often unrealized on small streams. Enough <br /> <br />68 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.