My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8097
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8097
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:33:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8097
Author
American Fisheries Society.
Title
Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting, Colorado - Wyoming Chapter, American Fisheries Society.
USFW Year
1983.
USFW - Doc Type
March 2-3, 1983.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />These observations and philosophies were, therefore, incorporated into this <br />preliminary investigation to eValuate the relative importance of manner of <br />feeding and diet preferences of the brown trout. <br /> <br />PROCEDURES <br /> <br />The fish source for the experiment was eggs hatched at the Fish Research <br />Hatchery, Bellvue, Colorado, which had been taken from wild spawners in <br />Delaney Buttes Lake, near Walden, Colorado. The experiment was started <br />17 December 1981 when 12,000 brown trout swim-up fry were divided into six <br />lots of 2,000 fish each. <br />Lots one and two were fed by hand as controls. Lots three and four were <br />fed by automatic feeders hung above the troughs which simply dropped the <br />feed onto the water surface. With this manner of feeding, human inter- <br />ference was removed during feeding. Lots five and six were fed by automatic <br />feeders with submerged feed delivery systems, which were designed to cater <br />to the brown trout's bottom-feeding tendencies in addition to removing human <br />interference. The automatic feeders and submerged feed delivery systems <br />(Fig. 1) were designed by Tom Mandis, Superintendent of the Fish Research <br />Hatchery. The feeders and delivery systems were constructed of readily <br />available materials to be economical in cost ($15/feeder) and simple in <br />operation. The automatic feeders were connected to a common 24-hr timer <br />which turned on an hourly timer to activate the feeders eight times a day. <br />The hand-fed lots were also fed eight times a day. <br />All lots were trained to feed with BioDieti however, since this was a <br />preliminary investigation, another variable, diet preference, was introduced <br />into the experiment (Table 1). When the fish size reached approximately <br />1,500/lb, lots one, three and five were switched to a dry commercial diet. <br />Lots two, four and six remained on BioDiet for the duration of the experiment. <br /> <br />Table 1. Manner and diet fed for six lots of brown trout. <br /> <br />Lot Manner fed <br />1 Hand fed <br />2 Hand fed <br />3 Automatic feeder, surface deli very <br />4 Automatic feeder, surface delivery <br />5 Automatic feeder, submerged delivery <br />6 Automatic feeder, submerged delivery <br /> <br />Diet fed <br /> <br />d' a <br />Dry let <br /> <br />BioDiet <br />. a <br />Dry dlet <br /> <br />BioDiet <br />,a <br />Dry diet <br /> <br />BioDiet <br /> <br />aTrained on BioDiet but switched to a dry diet as fish size reached approx- <br />imately 1,500 fish/lb. <br /> <br />Such a feed switch is a factor of economics and with cutthroat trout (Salmo <br />clarkii), the feed switch increased growth rates over fish fed strictly <br />BioDiet (Harris et al. 1980). <br /> <br />49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.