My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8097
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8097
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:33:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8097
Author
American Fisheries Society.
Title
Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting, Colorado - Wyoming Chapter, American Fisheries Society.
USFW Year
1983.
USFW - Doc Type
March 2-3, 1983.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The number of brown trout captured in the river in 1979 was 794; in <br />1980, 947 were captured. In 1980 only 313 brown trout were collected during <br />the upstream migration; 634 were collected during the downstream migration. <br />Survival of first~year spawners appeared to be very low. In 1980 only <br />4% of the fin-clipped fish, which first spawned in 1979, and 4% of the tag- <br />ged fish were repeat spawners. Similar results were observed by Jonssen and <br />Stenseth (1977). The apparent high mortality of tagged fish was attribu- <br />ted to old age. The high mortality for fin-clipped brown trout was attribu- <br />ted to low food reserves after spawning. Low food reserves were probably <br />compounded by a reduction in numbers of benthic food items caused by winter <br />drawdowns. McAfee (1976) indicated that the benthic fauna may decrease in <br />irrigation reservoirs as water levels decline. <br /> <br />Spawning Habitat <br /> <br />In the Blue River, 1.8% (936 m2) of the total study area (50,841 m2) <br />was usable spawning habitat. Much of the spawning habitat was confined to <br />small areas along stream banks. All spawning habitat appeared to be util- <br />ized, including areas that were considered marginal. <br />Spawning substrate consisted of gravel ranging 0.25-76 mm in diameter. <br />The most common size was 16-64 mm (Fig. 5). This is typical of most <br />trout-spawning habitat (Staley 1966, Reiser and Wesche 1977). Small particle <br />sizes (medium and fine sand, < 0.5 mm) averaged 0.7% of all substrate sam- <br />ples collected. This was well below the maximum amount (15%) that restricts <br />gravel flow (McNeil 1964, McNeil and Ahnell 1964). <br />Sixty brown trout nests were located in the study area. Their average <br />width was 31 em, mean length was 41 cm, and averagA depth of depression was <br />6.1 cm. Mean water velocity and depth were 0.04 m/sec and 20 cm, respec- <br />tively. Average distance to cover was 3.1 m. <br /> <br />Harvest <br /> <br />Anglers spent fewer hours fishing at Dillon Reservoir in 1980 than in <br />1979 (Davis 1982). An estimated total of 2063 brown trout was harvested <br />in 1979; in 1980, the estimated total was 1407. Catch per angler hour <br />(CPAH) was 0.011 and 0.009 in 1979 and 1980, respectively. The night <br />creel survey resulted in an estimated 200 brown trout harvested per month <br />in September and October. This suggested that a minimum of 1400 trout <br />were harvested at night in 1980, which doubled the total number of brown trout <br />taken from Dillon Reservoir in that year. Sixty-five percent of the brown <br />trout harvested in 1979 and 1980 ranged 305-405 mm TL, which corresponds to <br />the length range of first-time spawners. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Evaluation of Growth <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />One reason for the decline in size of brown trout may be related to <br />food supply, and mainly to forage fish availability. Prior to 1979, the <br /> <br />42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.