Laserfiche WebLink
<br />15 <br /> <br />that could be waded safely. Deeper channel locations were surveyed by <br />stretching a tag line marked at 3.05-m intervals across the channel and using a <br />motorboat equipped with a recording depth sounder to mark each interval on a <br />recorded trace. Four traces were completed for most cross sections. The <br />depth of flow at each point was calculated as the average of the four traces. <br />Standard errors also were calculated based on the scatter within the traces. <br />The survey data were combined with the, depth-sounding trace data for a <br />complete descriptiolJ of channel response,to a flood event. <br /> <br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Channel Bed Behavior <br /> <br /> <br />The Green River scours and fills during flood passage (Fig. 7). Average <br /> <br /> <br />bed elevation at the present cableway has not changed appreciably since 1930, <br /> <br /> <br />although bed elevation increased several times and then returned to the <br /> <br /> <br />previous level. Rising limb scour now only occurs during the largest post-dam <br /> <br /> <br />floods. Detailed measurements showed that the channel filled during passage <br /> <br /> <br />of the flood. <br /> <br />Channel Cross-Section Change <br /> <br /> <br />The channel has narrowed by about 25 m at the old cableway that was <br /> <br /> <br />used prior to 1930 (Fig. 8). Most bank accretion occurred on the left bank, <br /> <br /> <br />which is the inside of the channel bend. Photographs of the old ferry/eableway ." <br />