Laserfiche WebLink
<br />f\ ',~' tV -eo "'" HI c. <br /> <br />..: ~ <br /> <br />l'8~~ sA 11th- <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />Lq,.... .J' it..- <br /> <br />t:.-;v ~.r <br /> <br />::>r- 30 F-1'9 <br /> <br />M. I I enf\ug . <br /> <br />1 07'2-'10 <br /> <br />, ' , ' ,,-~' - ' <br /> <br />July 22, 1985 <br />LEA <br /> <br />Comments on Colorado River Flows for Endangered Fishes <br />Under the Colorado River Compact, the Upper Colorado <br />River Basin Compact, and the Treaty with Mexico. <br /> <br />"" <br /> <br />The Colorado River Compact of 1922 (CRC) apportions the waters <br />of the Colorado River System between the Upper Basin and the Lower <br />Basin of the Colorado River. The Upper Colorado River Basin Compact <br />of 1948 (UCRBC) apportions the water apportioned to the Upper Basin <br />under the CRC among the States of the Upper Basin. The 1944 <br />Rio Grande, Colorado, Tijuana Treaty (Treaty), in that part concerned <br />with the Colorado River, allocates water between the United States and <br />Mexico. <br /> <br />This commentary is based on a review of the CRC, UCRBC, and Treaty <br />for their effects on flows in the Colorado River System as they relate <br />to the endangered fishes. Pertinent excerpts from the Compacts and a <br />very brief Treaty summary are attached for reference. These excerpts <br />and summary are prepared for the purpose of discussing the f1Q~ <br />situation for the endangered fishes and are incomplete for more com- <br />prehensive considerations. - <br /> <br />\^ <br /> <br />The CRC was approved by the Congress in the 1929 Boulder Canyon <br />Project Act (45 Stat. 1057, 1064; Sec. 13, subsection (a)). The only <br />modifications made by the Congress concerned ratification requirements <br />and restrictions on California's water use. Neither affects the Upper <br />Basin water apportionment or use. The UCRBC was consented to by the <br />Congress in 1949 (63 Stat. 31), which also had the effect of reaffirming <br />the CRC. Both Compacts are therefore Acts of Congress, should have at <br />least the strengths of any other Acts of Congress pertaining to the <br />Colorado River System, and should be superior to any Congressional Acts <br />passed subsequent to the Compacts. <br /> <br />The water laws of the several Colorado River Basin States, the <br />two Compacts and the Treaty, and other Congressional Acts comprise <br />the "Law of the River". Both Compacts recognize the primacy of each <br />State and the right of each State to manage the waters within that State. <br /> <br />The key wording in the Compacts is probably the term "in perpetuity", <br />CRC Article III (a) and UCRBC Articles I (a) and III (a). This can only <br />mean that the apportionments are permanent, subject only to modification <br />by consent of all signatory States, and not subject to tampering by <br />Congress or any other entity. . <br /> <br />\ ." <br />, <br /> <br />t1~' ' <br />