My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7846
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7846
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:31:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7846
Author
American River Management Society
Title
Editor
USFW Year
Series
USFW - Doc Type
1994
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Protecting the Natural, Cultural, Scenic, Scientific and Recreational Values of the First <br />400 Miles of the Mississippi River <br /> <br />Molly MacGregor <br /> <br />The goal of this case study is to understand how the Mississippi Headwaters Board. a joint powers board of eight <br />counties in north central Minnesota, has developed and delivered programs to achieve the mission statement of <br />protecting the "natural, cultural, scenic, scientific and recreational values of the Mississippi River". We'll do <br />this by examining the following issues in four presentations: <br /> <br />1. Reviewing how the Mississippi Headwaters Board (MHB) has fulfilled its obligation in Minnesota <br />statute to identify the natural, cultural, scenic, scientific and recreational values of the first 400 miles of <br />the Mississippi River, and now is working to use those values to evaluate its program of river <br />protection through land use management. <br /> <br />2. Examining how water quality monitoring provides an ongoing assessment of the river's health. This <br />assessment helps us to evaluate how well our slrategy of river protection by land management is <br />working; to identify and remedy problems, and to build a working knowledge in the participants of the <br />dynamics of river ecology and human impact. <br /> <br />3. Investigating recreational use of the river, by asking river users and property owners about their use <br />of the river and the quality of that experience. The mandate to provide for management of recreational <br />use stems from the MHB's empowering legislation in Minnesota statute. The concern for recreational <br />management of the river also reflects the origins of the initiative to protect the Mississippi River <br />through the National Wild and Scenic River act. The current research initiative is telling us who sues <br />the river, how it is used and what we as river managers need to know to start evaluating and managing <br />those uses. <br /> <br />4. Considering how a conflict developed regarding implementation of the MHB's fundamental river <br />protection tool -- regulation of privately owned lands in the river corridor. <br /> <br />The title of the first inquiry of this case study is "How We Learned to Identify the Natural, Cultural, Scenic, <br />Scientific and Recreational Values of the First 400 Miles of the Mississippi River." The MHB's investigation <br />of the river's values is mandated by its empowering legislation. The MHB has a very specific tool for <br />implementing river protection --regulation of land use on privately-owned lands in a defined corridor adjacent to <br />the first 400 miles of the Mississippi River. <br /> <br />The challenge posed by the MHB's obligation to protect the river is broader than what can be achieved by <br />prohibiting commercial development, managing foreslry or by placing a new structure 150 feet back from the <br />river instead of 50 feet back. Zoning and land use are specific activities, defined by numbers, with specific <br />process for implementation and review. When a zoning board is presented with a request for action, the process <br />it must follow is set, and therefore, limited by law. What can be considered in making the decision is limited to <br />the facts of the case itself. At present, zoning law does not provide directive to zoning boards on how to assess <br />the positive or negative impact of a request for a new home, or a remodeled deck on the river. <br /> <br />In short, there is a gap between the mission of the MHB -- protection of five values --and the tool given the <br />MHB to achieve its mission -- regulation of land use. The challenge to the MHB, then, is to fulfill its mission <br />to protect the natural, cultural, scenic, scientific and recreational values of the Mississippi River, develop a <br />management plan for assuring how that mission will be reached and to evaluate ongoing river protection efforts, <br />including administration of the land regulation program. <br /> <br />Protection of a river requires first a recognition of the elements that give the river value to humans: <br /> <br />. The river's natural setting, by which is meant the soils, landforms, plants and communities of <br />plants, the animals, birds and insects, the river channel itself and the quality of the water; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.