Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />LIST OF KEY WORDS <br /> <br />Colorado pikeminnow, larval drift, Colorado River, Gunnison, Aspinall Unit, Colorado River native <br />fish, IS-Mile Reach, 18-mile reach <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />This study was part of the Aspinall study and initiated in 1992. The objectives were to <br />determine the relative abundance of Colorado pikeminnow larvae produced by wild adults in the <br />upper main stem Colorado River and to determine correlations between flow and habitat availability <br />upon growing season and size of Colorado pikeminnow young-of-the-year. Colorado pikeminnow <br />reproductive success was determined by collection of larval fish in drift nets at three locations on the <br />Colorado river and three locations on the Gunnison river for three to five year periods. The three <br />stations sampled for all five study years were: the Colorado River near Loma at RK 247; the <br />Colorado River just upstream of the Gunnison confluence at RK 275; and the Gunnison River (below <br />Redlands diversion) (RK 3). A station located on the Gunnison River above the Redlands Diversion <br />at RK 8.8 was sampled for four years and sites on the Colorado River located at RK 270 and on the <br />Gunnison River at Bridgeport (RK 47) were sampled for three years. <br /> <br />Larval Colorado pikeminnow were collected at all three stations in the Gunnison River, but in <br />not every year. Larval Colorado pikeminnow were collected but only during one year at the IS-Mile <br />Reach site, just upstream of the confluence. Pikeminnow larvae were collected during the three years <br />of sampling at the Middle station located 2.2 mile downstream of the confluence and during all five <br />years at the Loma station. <br /> <br />The timing of reproduction was earlier during the two low flow years when water <br />temperatures reached 18C in early June than in the high flow years when it took longer for water <br />temperature to warm to that level. Larval abundance estimates were made each year for all species <br />collected. A positive relationship between Colorado pikeminnow abundance and the native fish <br />abundance was found. Correlations were made between larval abundance and flow variables. A <br />strong positive relationship (significant) was found between native and Colorado pikeminnow larval <br />abundance and the mean flow between July 1 and August 15 (drift season). There was a non- <br />significant (alpha = 0.30) negative tendency between flow and abundance of nonnative larvae in the <br />drift. The highest flow year produced the highest density and drift estimates for native and Colorado <br />pikeminnow and the lowest flow year produced the least numbers of native and pikeminnow larvae. <br /> <br />Different trends were found for pikeminnow drift abundance between years at Loma- <br />Westwater, Westwater-Moab and Loma-Moab. The biggest discrepancy was in the intermediate flow <br />year of 1996. In 1996 drift density was low (fourth offive years) at Lorna, but high at Westwater <br />and Moab (second offive years). Also no relationship was found between larval drift densities at <br />Loma with young-of-year densities sampled in nursery habitats near Moab. The highest pikeminnow <br />and nonnative cyprinid densities during fall backwater seining were in 1996, the year with the least <br />number of native and nonnative larvae measured in the drift at Loma. <br /> <br />Vll <br />