Laserfiche WebLink
<br />24 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />which suggests some spawning taking place below Westwater. Similar annual trends in <br />Colorado pikeminnow drift and higher densities at Moab than Loma suggest that larvae <br />produced in Colorado could be contributing to larval numbers sampled in Moab. <br />However, since the Westwater data do not support a progressively increasing downstream <br />drift and since there are opposing results between study sites in 1996, the significance of <br />larvae produced in Colorado are not strongly apparent. <br /> <br />Tyus and Haines (1991) reported it took about 6 days for the transport of newly <br />emerged ( sac fry) Colorado pikeminnow from the spawning grounds (RK 26.4 to 29.1) to <br />the mouth of the Yampa (RK 0). Eventually young Colorado pikeminnow were observed <br />about 160 km downstream in the Green River and were believed to have originated from <br />the Yampa River spawning reach (Tyus and Karp 1991). In the Colorado River it appears <br />that spawning is more wide spread than in the Yampa River. Since spawning begins <br />earlier in downstream reaches, the source of larvae sampled in the Moab reach could have <br />originated from fish that spawned a relatively short distance upstream to spawning sites <br />located 160 km upstream in Colorado. <br /> <br />Colorado Pikeminnow YOY Size and Survival (Obiective 2) <br /> <br />The second study objective was to assess the impacts of flow on the growing <br />season using size of Colorado pikeminnow young-of-year as a qualitative indicator. <br />Presumably larger young-of-year fish are more fit for over-winter survivorship and larger <br />size fry result in years that have more benevolent conditions for growth. The type of data <br />generated by sampling fish larvae is not suited for such an analysis, since all larvae <br />sampled were less than 12 nun, about 15 days post hatch. <br /> <br />Mean size of Colorado pikeminnow larvae in the drift (Loma, Colorado) was <br />similar (9.3 and 9.5 mm) between years, but the date larvae were first collected and the <br />median collection date were variable between years and apparently related to water <br />temperatures. Mean length of yay in summer backwater samples was highly variable <br />between years and negatively related to water temperatures with greater size in low runoff <br />years and reduced size in high years. The year with the smallest mean was in the year with <br />the slowest warming (1995) and the year with the largest mean YOY size in summer <br />backwaters was in the year with the earliest warming (1994). <br /> <br />Colorado pikeminnow larvae were sampled in backwater habitats at sizes less than <br />11 mm, but were not sampled in the drift at lengths over 11 mm. The fact that <br />pikeminnow larvae over 11 rom were not collected by drift nets strongly indicates that <br />either this sized larval were not vulnerable to the drift net sampling gear or they abandon <br />the drift to begin to use or reside in backwater habitats at that size. If larvae over 11 mm <br />are drifting but are not being sampled, transport abundance would be underestimated at <br />downstream sites. Otherwise the data indicates that larvae are quickly transported <br />downstream ofLoma. <br /> <br />The best year (1994) for over-winter survival rate for Colorado pikeminnowwas <br />also the best year for NNC over-winter survival. The four years of spring NNC and <br />