My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9299
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9299
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:29:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9299
Author
Anderson, R. and J. Mumma.
Title
Aspinall Studies
USFW Year
1999.
USFW - Doc Type
Annual assessment of Colorado Pikeminnow Larval Production in the Gunnison and Colorado Rivers, Colorado 1992-1996.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />22 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />characterized by high summer flows with much cooler water temperatures, which <br />apparently explains why fish reproduction was 3 to 5 weeks later than in other years. <br />Flows in July 1995 ranged from 35,000 to 15,100 cfs and habitats resulting from flows in <br />this range appeared to have been beneficial for native larval production, but detrimental <br />for abundance of nonnative species larvae. Other studies have reported that native fishes, <br />usually in regard to the adult-life stage, seem to tolerate higher flow events than nonnative <br />species (McAda and Kaeding, 1989; Hawkins and Nesler, 1991; and Muth and Nesler, <br />1993). This study suggests that this is also the case for nonnative larval fish abundance. If <br />nonnative fish numbers were reduced in 1995 compared to other years, the increase in <br />native larval could be associated with reduced competition or predation and therefore be <br />independent of improved habitat availability due to flow conditions. <br /> <br />The year with the third highest Colorado pikeminnow density and drift estimate at <br />Loma was 1993, the other high flow year. Colorado pikeminnow drift estimates were <br />similar in 1992 and 1993 even though flows were much higher in 1993. This suggests that <br />flow and temperature alone do not regulate larval abundance. <br /> <br />Flow conditions in 1996 were moderate and intermediate to the two low flow and <br />the two high flow years. If the moderate flow year had produced intermediate numbers of <br />native or pikeminnow larvae there would have been very strong correlations between flow <br />and larval production for stations located in Colorado. However Colorado larval catch <br />rates and native fish and pikeminnow were poor in 1996. In contrast, Trammel (1999a) <br />found Colorado pikeminnow larval abundance on the Colorado River was above average <br />in 1996 at Westwater and Moab. Density of native species larvae were above average in <br />two of the Gunnison River stations in 1996. Therefore catch results were inconsistent <br />between stations, with the three upper Colorado River stations having low native larvae <br />production and the lower Colorado and Gunnison River stations with high larval <br />production. Flow conditions alone apparently do not account for the low numbers of <br />native larvae collected in 1996 at Loma. <br /> <br />Longitudinal Trends in Colorado Pikeminnow Abundance <br /> <br />.Colorado pikeminnow density increased in a downstream direction for the three <br />drift sampling stations on the Colorado River in Colorado. Near the confluence of the <br />Gunnison River, catch rates were zero to near zero between 1994 and 1996. At the <br />Middle Station just 3.2 miles downstream catch rates increased, ranging from 1.0 to 10.2 <br />CPMl1000 m3 between 1994 and 1996. Catch rates increased at Loma by 67% to 400% <br />over the Middle Station during the same three-year period. This increase in Colorado <br />pikeminnow larval numbers in a downstream direction suggests that there was at least one <br />Colorado pikeminnow spawning site located above the Middle station and at least one <br />spawning location between the Middle and Lorna Stations. <br /> <br />The onset of spawning occurred earlier at Westwater than at Loma in 4 out of 5 <br />years, indicating spawning is occurring between Loma and Westwater. Also the <br />Westwater station is located below a suspected spawning site, only a few miles upstream <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.