Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Table 9. Median drift date at Lorna and size and date of Colorado pikeminnow <br />YOY sampled in backwaters in Moab (Trammel, 1999a). <br /> <br /> SUMMER FALL <br />YEAR Median Sample Range Mean Date Mean Date <br /> Date drift Size MM MM Sampled MM Sampled <br />1992 14-Jul 378 11-33 21 5-Aug 36.6 28-Sep <br />1993 29-Jul 47 13-32 17.8 13-Aug 35 5-0ct <br />1994 12-Jul 88 1 0-36 22.2 25-Jul 50.7 1 O-Oct <br />1995 19-Aug 1 12 12 19-Aug 31.6 29-Sep <br />1996 21-Jul 1101 9-35 16.4 2-Aug 43.2 6-0ct <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Colorado Pikeminnow Distribution. Gunnison River <br /> <br />Numbers of Colorado pikeminnow larvae collected in the Gunnison were low, but <br />document the existence of a spawning population. Two larvae were collected at the lower <br />Gunnison station in 1992, the first year of the study. None were found either above or <br />below the Redlands diversion dam in 1993 and 1994. One larva was sampled above and <br />two below Redlands dam in 1995, and three larvae were collected from both stations in <br />1996. Although every low numbers, Colorado pikeminnow larval densities were similar <br />both above and below the diversion dam suggesting similar larval population sizes at both <br />locations. Colorado pikeminnow must be spawning upstream of the dam, but if they are <br />also spawning between the dam and the lower sampling station, the drifting larvae <br />population should be higher below the dam. Since the sample did not iI).dicate this, the <br />larvae sampled at the lower Gunnison station could have originated from the same source <br />as those collected above the dam. <br /> <br />The Redlands dam was constructed in 1918, and completely blocked upstream <br />migration of adult pikeminnow until construction of a fish ladder in 1997 (Burdick 1997). <br />Colorado pikeminnow larvae were found at Bridgeport (RM 29.3) in 1994, 1995 and <br />1996 which is about 26 miles upstream of the Redlands diversion dam. Larval production, <br />survival, and retention were apparently adequate over the last 87 years to maintain a small <br />resident population. Burdick (1995) speculated that movement of six of seven radio- <br />tagged adult pikeminnow appeared consistent with those expected spawning migration <br />movements. Those fish congregated in a location about four miles upstream of the <br />Bridgeport drift sampling station. Obviously if all larvae drifted below Redlands the adult <br />pikeminnow population of the Gunnison River would have been lost to attrition. <br />Abundance of Colorado pikeminnow collected immediately above the dam (n =;; 5) were <br />the same as at Bridgeport (n =;; 5), indicating that perhaps a high proportion of this rivers <br />larval population is vulnerable to drifting out of the reach. However, the slowed currents <br />and deeper habitats created by Redlands diversion dam may discourage all larvae from <br />drifting over the dam. Also, suspected spawning sites [28 to 32 miles, Burdick (1995)] <br />19 <br />